Alessa Pang

Type of Practice: General Practice
Total Cases Handled: 4 judgments

Alessa Pang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in ad hoc admission and anti-suit injunction. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Alessa Pang has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and international arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Submission to Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Investment Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Hotel Management Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guerrilla tactics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forum	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alessa Pang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Alessa Pang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	Sun Travels v Hilton: Examination of Judgment Debtor & Enforceability of Foreign Assets(Jul 2020) Hilton v Sun Travels: Anti-Suit Injunction for Breach of Arbitration Agreement(Mar 2018) Re Landau: Ad Hoc Admission for CMNC's Arbitration Award Challenge(Nov 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Alessa Pang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.0
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	25%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	29.3 parties avg	9.3	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	29.5 parties avg	9.5
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Alessa Pang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	12,000.00	6,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sun Travels v Hilton: Examination of Judgment Debtor & Enforceability of Foreign Assets 05 Jul 2020 Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	05 Jul 2020	Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal UpheldThe respondent's position was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
2	Hilton v Sun Travels: Anti-Suit Injunction for Breach of Arbitration Agreement 13 Mar 2018 Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	13 Mar 2018	Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff): Limited permanent anti-suit injunction grantedLimited permanent anti-suit injunction granted in relation to the March Judgment, a declaration that the Awards were final, valid and binding on the parties, and a declaration that the defendant’s claim in the Maldivian action was in respect of disputes between the plaintiff and defendant that have arisen out of or in connection with the Agreement and any consequential proceedings (including appeals) would be in breach of the arbitration agreement contained in the Agreement. It was also made clear that nothing in the order would prevent the defendant from objecting to the recognition or enforcement of the Awards in accordance with Maldivian law. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Re Landau: Ad Hoc Admission for CMNC's Arbitration Award Challenge 27 Nov 2016 Toby Thomas Landau (Applicant)Lost	27 Nov 2016	Toby Thomas Landau (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for ad hoc admission dismissed with costs fixed at $6,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Re Wordsworth: Ad Hoc Admission for Lesotho's Investor-State Arbitration Challenge 28 Aug 2016 Samuel Sherratt Wordsworth (Applicant)Won	28 Aug 2016	Samuel Sherratt Wordsworth (Applicant): Application AllowedApplication for ad hoc admission allowed.