Alexis Loo

Type of Practice: General Practice
Total Cases Handled: 3 judgments

Alexis Loo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and garnishee proceedings.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Alexis Loo has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	2 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alexis Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	15% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Alexis Loo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Alexis Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Alexis Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alexis Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alexis Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Alexis Loo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Upskirt Filming	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alexis Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alexis Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alexis Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Alexis Loo has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Chan Lie Sian v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction Appeal - Sudden Fight Defence(Jul 2019) Telecom Credit Inc v Star Commerce Pte Ltd: Garnishee Order Dispute(Nov 2017)
Lee & Lee	1 cases	33% of cases	Ang Zhu Ci Joshua v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Filming Upskirt Videos(Jul 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Alexis Loo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Alexis Loo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Partial	2(67%)	67%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chan Lie Sian v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction Appeal - Sudden Fight Defence 29 Jul 2019 Chan Lie Sian (Appellant)Partial	29 Jul 2019	Chan Lie Sian (Appellant): Conviction under s 300(a) of the PC set aside; conviction under s 300(c) of the PC substituted; death penalty set aside; sentence of life imprisonment imposedThe Court of Appeal substituted the appellant’s conviction under s 300(a) of the PC with a conviction under s 300(c) of the PC and sentenced him to life imprisonment.
2	Telecom Credit Inc v Star Commerce Pte Ltd: Garnishee Order Dispute 16 Nov 2017 Midas United Group Pte Ltd (Garnishee)Neutral	16 Nov 2017	Midas United Group Pte Ltd (Garnishee): Garnishee Order Nisi ChallengedMidas successfully challenged the Order Nisi, resulting in a trial to determine its liability.
3	Ang Zhu Ci Joshua v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Filming Upskirt Videos 20 Jul 2016 Ang Zhu Ci Joshua (Appellant)Partial	20 Jul 2016	Ang Zhu Ci Joshua (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe appeal was allowed in part, with the global sentence reduced from 36 weeks to 24 weeks' imprisonment.