Alexius Chew Hui Jun

Type of Practice: General Practice
Total Cases Handled: 2 judgments

Alexius Chew Hui Jun is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in employment law and judgments and orders. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Alexius Chew Hui Jun has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Alexius Chew Hui Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Alexius Chew Hui Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alexius Chew Hui Jun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alexius Chew Hui Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alexius Chew Hui Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alexius Chew Hui Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Alexius Chew Hui Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alexius Chew Hui Jun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alexius Chew Hui Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Prospective Overruling	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alexius Chew Hui Jun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory Judgment	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alexius Chew Hui Jun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Alexius Chew Hui Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alexius Chew Hui Jun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alexius Chew Hui Jun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Alexius Chew Hui Jun has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Titanium Law Chambers LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	Foo Kok Boon v Ngow Kheong Shen: Prospective Overruling & Causation in Interlocutory Judgments(Jul 2023) Normet Singapore v Koh Wee Xiong: Wrongful Dismissal, Breach of Contract & Employee Compensation Dispute(Nov 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Alexius Chew Hui Jun's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Alexius Chew Hui Jun's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Foo Kok Boon v Ngow Kheong Shen: Prospective Overruling & Causation in Interlocutory Judgments 11 Jul 2023 Foo Kok Boon (Applicant, Defendant)Lost	11 Jul 2023	Foo Kok Boon (Applicant, Defendant): Application DismissedThe applicant's application to set aside the consent interlocutory judgment was dismissed.
2	Normet Singapore v Koh Wee Xiong: Wrongful Dismissal, Breach of Contract & Employee Compensation Dispute 22 Nov 2021 Koh Wee Xiong @ Xu Weixiang (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	22 Nov 2021	Koh Wee Xiong @ Xu Weixiang (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedKoh's appeal against the Judge’s finding that his dismissal was not wrongful as well as the Judge’s rejection of his claims for commission, Retention Incentive Bonus and annual bonus was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.