Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann

Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and solicitor's duties. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Guarantee	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Rental Agreements	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Printing Equipment	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
A.Ang, Seah & Hoe	1 cases	50% of cases	GE Capital v Fuelcon Trading: Breach of Contract & Equipment Performance Dispute(Sep 2008)
A. Ang, Seah & Hoe	1 cases	50% of cases	Zhang Run Zi v Ascentsia Law Corp: Breach of Contract, Negligence, Solicitors' Duties(Aug 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	993,105.91	496,552.962 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Zhang Run Zi v Ascentsia Law Corp: Breach of Contract, Negligence, Solicitors' Duties 16 Aug 2018 Ascentsia Law Corp (Defendant)Won	16 Aug 2018	Ascentsia Law Corp (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; costs fixed at $200,000 in the aggregate to be paid by the Plaintiff, with disbursements at $5,836.63. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	GE Capital v Fuelcon Trading: Breach of Contract & Equipment Performance Dispute 17 Sep 2008 GE Capital Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	17 Sep 2008	GE Capital Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedPlaintiff's claim against the first defendant for arrears of payment, amounting to $793,105.91, and late payment charges under the rental agreements was allowed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).