Alfred Tan

Alfred Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in child custody and civil practice. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Alfred Tan has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in child custody and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Child Custody	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alfred Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alfred Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alfred Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alfred Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alfred Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alfred Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alfred Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alfred Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alfred Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alfred Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Alfred Tan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Alfred Tan & Co	1 cases	50% of cases	Bayerische Landesbank v Dato Azlan: Amending Summary Judgment for Overstated Sum(Sep 2002)
Alfred Tan and Co	1 cases	50% of cases	AQL v AQM: Child Custody Dispute Over Care and Control of a Young Child(Dec 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Alfred Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Alfred Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
USD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	AQL v AQM: Child Custody Dispute Over Care and Control of a Young Child 15 Dec 2011 AQM (Respondent)Won	15 Dec 2011	AQM (Respondent): Sole care and control grantedWife was granted sole care and control of the child.
2	Bayerische Landesbank v Dato Azlan: Amending Summary Judgment for Overstated Sum 08 Sep 2002 Dato Azlan bin Hashim (Defendant, Respondent)Neutral	08 Sep 2002	Dato Azlan bin Hashim (Defendant, Respondent): Amendment AllowedThe court allowed the plaintiff's appeal to amend the judgment to reflect the correct amount due. The defendant did not oppose the amendment.