Alvin Liong

Alvin Liong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in care and control and access to children. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Alvin Liong has demonstrated expertise across 41 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dividends	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stocks and shares	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Website Infringement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Securities Trading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Liong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Alvin Liong has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	7 cases	100% of cases	Cordlife Group v. Cryoviva Singapore: Trademark, Copyright Infringement & Passing Off Assessment(Apr 2016) Lee Siew Ngug v Lee Brothers: Rectification of Company Register & Minority Shareholder Rights(Apr 2015) Tiananmen KTV v Furama: Interim Injunction for Tenancy Agreements Dispute(Mar 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Alvin Liong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.0 parties avg	2.0	71%
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	14%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	35.3 parties avg	5.3
2015	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Alvin Liong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(71%)	71%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	1(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	73,404.63	12,234.116 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2015	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Cordlife Group v. Cryoviva Singapore: Trademark, Copyright Infringement & Passing Off Assessment 14 Apr 2016 Cryoviva Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	14 Apr 2016	Cryoviva Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Damages AwardedDamages awarded to the Plaintiff in the amount of $63,904.63 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Lee Siew Ngug v Lee Brothers: Rectification of Company Register & Minority Shareholder Rights 22 Apr 2015 Lee Hiok Kee Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Won	22 Apr 2015	Lee Hiok Kee Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Defendants' appeal was allowed and the Plaintiffs' originating summons was struck out. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Tiananmen KTV v Furama: Interim Injunction for Tenancy Agreements Dispute 26 Mar 2015 Tiananmen KTV (2013) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Mar 2015	Tiananmen KTV (2013) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication for interim injunction dismissed with costs to the defendant fixed at $7,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	AOB v AOC: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance in Divorce 19 Jan 2015 AOB (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Jan 2015	AOB (Plaintiff): Monthly maintenance for the children to be paid by herThe wife is to pay $2,500 as monthly maintenance for the children (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	AmFraser Securities v Goh Chengyu: Summary Judgment, Unauthorized Trading & Conclusive Evidence Clauses 28 Jul 2014 AMFRASER SECURITIES PTE LTD (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Jul 2014	AMFRASER SECURITIES PTE LTD (Plaintiff): Application for summary judgment dismissedThe Plaintiff's application for summary judgment was dismissed.
6	Sandz Solutions v Strategic Worldwide: Dividends Dispute & Unwinding of Lexicon SPA 20 May 2014 Sandz Solutions (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	20 May 2014	Sandz Solutions (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; the Judge’s decision below that Strategic is entitled to a 25% share of the $4m Dividends is overturned. The Appellants are entitled to the costs of Strategic’s claim in the Present Suit here and below. We make no order as to the costs of the Appellants’ counterclaim. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Lek Gwee Noi v Humming Flowers: Restrictive Covenant, Non-Competition, and Non-Solicitation 07 Apr 2014 Humming Flowers & Gifts Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	07 Apr 2014	Humming Flowers & Gifts Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the plaintiff. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.