Alvin Tan Kheng Ann

Alvin Tan Kheng Ann is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and director's duties. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 38% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated expertise across 48 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice11% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Sale Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unlicensed moneylending	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Power of Sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Reporting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Market Misconduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Creative accounting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Alvin Tan Kheng Ann has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong Thomas & Leong	6 cases	75% of cases	Lim Geok Lin Andy v Yap Jin Meng Bryan: Abuse of Process, Contract Variation, and Oral Agreement Dispute(Aug 2017) Ochroid Trading v Chua Siok Lui: Unenforceability of Loan Agreements due to Illegal Moneylending(Mar 2017) Ho Kang Peng v Scintronix: Breach of Fiduciary Duty for Unauthorized Payments(Apr 2014)
Wong Thomas and Leong	2 cases	25% of cases	Tan Chor Chuan v Tan Yeow Hiang: Defamation, Fair Comment, and Qualified Privilege in Chess Federation Dispute(Sep 2005) Vita Health v Pang: Director's Duties, Fictitious Sales, Breach of Contract & Misrepresentation(Jul 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Alvin Tan Kheng Ann's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 13.3
Complex Cases: 3 (38%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Lost	42.8 parties avg	2.8	50%
Won	317.4 parties avg	17.4	38%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2005	120.0 parties avg	20.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Alvin Tan Kheng Ann's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(13%)	13%
Lost	4(50%)	50%
Won	3(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Geok Lin Andy v Yap Jin Meng Bryan: Abuse of Process, Contract Variation, and Oral Agreement Dispute 13 Aug 2017 Lim Geok Lin Andy (Appellant)Lost	13 Aug 2017	Lim Geok Lin Andy (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the Respondent.
2	Ochroid Trading v Chua Siok Lui: Unenforceability of Loan Agreements due to Illegal Moneylending 21 Mar 2017 Chua Siok Lui (trading as VIE Import & Export) (Defendant)Won	21 Mar 2017	Chua Siok Lui (trading as VIE Import & Export) (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ho Kang Peng v Scintronix: Breach of Fiduciary Duty for Unauthorized Payments 29 Apr 2014 Ho Kang Peng (Appellant)Lost	29 Apr 2014	Ho Kang Peng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, and Ho Kang Peng was found to have breached his fiduciary duties.
4	Scintronix v Ho Kang Peng: Director's Breach of Duty & Employee Fidelity in Employee Poaching & Payments 07 Feb 2013 Chow Weng Fook (Defendant)Dismissed	07 Feb 2013	Chow Weng Fook (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim against Chow Weng Fook dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Tan Eck Hong v Maxz Universal: Specific Performance of Shareholders’ Agreement Dispute 29 Nov 2012 Tan Eck Hong (Plaintiff)Won	29 Nov 2012	Tan Eck Hong (Plaintiff): Judgment for the PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; specific performance of the Second Shareholders’ Agreement ordered. MDG is required to transfer 740,400 TR shares to TEH. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Kong Swee Eng v Rolles Rudolf Jurgen August: Sale of Shares, Overreaching, and Frustration 11 Oct 2010 Kong Swee Eng (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Oct 2010	Kong Swee Eng (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs.
7	Tan Chor Chuan v Tan Yeow Hiang: Defamation, Fair Comment, and Qualified Privilege in Chess Federation Dispute 27 Sep 2005 Tan Yeow Hiang Kenneth (Defendant)Won	27 Sep 2005	Tan Yeow Hiang Kenneth (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant.
8	Vita Health v Pang: Director's Duties, Fictitious Sales, Breach of Contract & Misrepresentation 28 Jul 2004 Pang Seng Meng (Defendant)Lost	28 Jul 2004	Pang Seng Meng (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant; ordered to pay damages and cancel bonus shares (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).