Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai

Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in functus officio and restraint of trade. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Functus Officio	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Investment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial Products	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share Capital	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Non-Solicitation Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong Partnership	3 cases	50% of cases	Panwah Steel v Koh Brothers: Project-Specific Contract Dispute Over Steel Rebars for Changi Water Reclamation Plant(Sep 2006) Panwah Steel v Burwill Trading: Breach of Contract, Damages, and Sale of Goods(Sep 2006) Tang Boon Jek Jeffrey v Tan Poh Leng Stanley: Arbitrator's Power to Revisit Award(Jun 2001)
WongPartnership LLP	2 cases	33% of cases	Enterprise Fund III Ltd v OUE Lippo Healthcare: Company Acquiring Own Shares & Estoppel(Sep 2019) Koh Kim Teck v Credit Suisse: Negligence, Duty of Care & Banking(Mar 2019)
WongPartnership	1 cases	17% of cases	Man Financial v Wong: Breach of Non-Solicitation Clause & Restraint of Trade(Nov 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.9
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	17%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	42.3 parties avg	2.3	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	23.8 parties avg	3.8

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Alvin Yeo Khirn Hai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	4(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	38,356.84	9,589.214 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Enterprise Fund III Ltd v OUE Lippo Healthcare: Company Acquiring Own Shares & Estoppel 12 Sep 2019 The Enterprise Fund III Ltd (Appellant)Lost	12 Sep 2019	The Enterprise Fund III Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed.
2	Koh Kim Teck v Credit Suisse: Negligence, Duty of Care & Banking 24 Mar 2019 Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch (Defendant)Won	24 Mar 2019	Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; no monetary award. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Man Financial v Wong: Breach of Non-Solicitation Clause & Restraint of Trade 28 Nov 2007 Man Financial (S) Pte Ltd (formerly known as E D & F Man International (S) Pte Ltd) (Appellant)Won	28 Nov 2007	Man Financial (S) Pte Ltd (formerly known as E D & F Man International (S) Pte Ltd) (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs; the respondent was not entitled to the Compensation under the Termination Agreement.
4	Panwah Steel v Koh Brothers: Project-Specific Contract Dispute Over Steel Rebars for Changi Water Reclamation Plant 17 Sep 2006 Panwah Steel Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	17 Sep 2006	Panwah Steel Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Panwah Steel not liable for the shortfall in rebars. No monetary amount specified.
5	Panwah Steel v Burwill Trading: Breach of Contract, Damages, and Sale of Goods 17 Sep 2006 Panwah Steel Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	17 Sep 2006	Panwah Steel Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in part, appeal allowed in partAppeal dismissed with respect to the Changi Agreement. Appeal allowed with respect to the quantum of damages awardable in so far as the Burmese Agreements are concerned. Damages of $38,356.84 awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Tang Boon Jek Jeffrey v Tan Poh Leng Stanley: Arbitrator's Power to Revisit Award 21 Jun 2001 Tang Boon Jek Jeffrey (Appellant)Won	21 Jun 2001	Tang Boon Jek Jeffrey (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs here and below. The order of the court below is set aside. The security for costs (with any accrued interest) shall be refunded to the appellant or his solicitors.