Amadeus Huang Zhen

Amadeus Huang Zhen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and natural justice. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Amadeus Huang Zhen has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Amadeus Huang Zhen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Amadeus Huang Zhen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Amadeus Huang Zhen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amadeus Huang Zhen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Amadeus Huang Zhen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Amadeus Huang Zhen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Amadeus Huang Zhen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Procedural fairness	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Amadeus Huang Zhen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amadeus Huang Zhen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Amadeus Huang Zhen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Amadeus Huang Zhen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Amadeus Huang Zhen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Amadeus Huang Zhen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Amadeus Huang Zhen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Amadeus Huang Zhen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Amadeus Huang Zhen has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	CAJ v CAI: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Excess of Jurisdiction(Nov 2021) CAI v CAJ: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Excess of Jurisdiction in Construction Dispute(Jan 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Amadeus Huang Zhen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Amadeus Huang Zhen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CAJ v CAI: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Excess of Jurisdiction 10 Nov 2021 CAI (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	10 Nov 2021	CAI (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal UpheldThe Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the portion of the arbitral award relating to the extension of time.
2	CAI v CAJ: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Excess of Jurisdiction in Construction Dispute 28 Jan 2021 CAI (Plaintiff)Partial	28 Jan 2021	CAI (Plaintiff): Application allowed in partApplication to set aside the Tribunal’s decision to grant the defendants an extension of time of 25 days for the delay in Mechanical Completion was allowed.