Amanda Lim

Amanda Lim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in torts and disciplinary proceedings. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Amanda Lim has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and appellate practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Amanda Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Amanda Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amanda Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amanda Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amanda Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Amanda Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amanda Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Amanda Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Amanda Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amanda Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Amanda Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Amanda Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Escrow Agreements	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amanda Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trespass	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Amanda Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Nuisance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amanda Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Solicitors' Accounts Rules	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amanda Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Neighbouring Properties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Amanda Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Amanda Lim has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee & Lee	2 cases	100% of cases	Law Society v Gurdaib Singh: Disciplinary Proceedings for Breach of Escrow Agreement and Solicitors' Accounts Rules(Feb 2018) Shi Ka Yee v Nasrat Lucas Muzayyin: Tree Pruning Dispute and Tort Claims(Jul 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Amanda Lim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.7 parties avg	2.7	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Amanda Lim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,000.00	6,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Law Society v Gurdaib Singh: Disciplinary Proceedings for Breach of Escrow Agreement and Solicitors' Accounts Rules 26 Feb 2018 The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	26 Feb 2018	The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Judgment for the ApplicantCosts of the proceedings fixed at $6,000 awarded to the Law Society. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Shi Ka Yee v Nasrat Lucas Muzayyin: Tree Pruning Dispute and Tort Claims 19 Jul 2016 Nasrat Lucas Muzayyin (Respondent)Won	19 Jul 2016	Nasrat Lucas Muzayyin (Respondent): Successful defense against appealNasrat Lucas Muzayyin successfully defended against Shi Ka Yee's application for leave to appeal.