Amanda Sum

Amanda Sum is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and work injury compensation. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Amanda Sum has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and constitutional law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	3 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Online Falsehoods	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Equal protection of the law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Prosecutorial Discretion	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Communications and Media	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Amanda Sum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Amanda Sum has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	4 cases	100% of cases	Xu Yuan Chen v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Prosecutorial Discretion & Equal Protection(Dec 2021) Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General: POFMA, Statutory Interpretation, Online Falsehoods(Feb 2020) Chong Sher Shen v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Dismissal of Criminal Revision Regarding Erroneous Criminal Records(May 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Amanda Sum's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	25%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Amanda Sum's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,000.00	2,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Xu Yuan Chen v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Prosecutorial Discretion & Equal Protection 29 Dec 2021 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	29 Dec 2021	Attorney-General (Respondent): Costs AwardedCosts of $5,000 awarded to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General: POFMA, Statutory Interpretation, Online Falsehoods 04 Feb 2020 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	04 Feb 2020	Attorney-General (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe court found in favor of the Attorney-General, upholding the Correction Directions. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
3	Chong Sher Shen v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Dismissal of Criminal Revision Regarding Erroneous Criminal Records 16 May 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 May 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion DismissedThe Respondent successfully opposed the Criminal Motion, which was dismissed.
4	Temasek Polytechnic v Poh Peng Ghee: Work Injury Compensation Appeal 27 Sep 2018 Attorney-General (Intervening Party)Neutral	27 Sep 2018	Attorney-General (Intervening Party): NeutralThe Attorney-General intervened in the appeal.