Amarick Gill Singh

Amarick Gill Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and murder. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and evidence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Murder	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unlawful assembly	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Common object	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Common intention	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Voluntariness of statement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amarick Gill Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Amarick Gill Singh has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Amarick Gill LLC	2 cases	50% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Mohamad Yazid: Trafficking and Abetting Diamorphine Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act(May 2016) Public Prosecutor v Micheal Anak Garing: Sentencing for Murder with Common Intention(Apr 2015)
Amarick Gill & Co	1 cases	25% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Micheal Anak Garing: Joint Intention in Fatal Robbery(Jan 2014)
Tan Gill & Paul	1 cases	25% of cases	PP v Fazely bin Rahmat: Unlawful Assembly, Common Object, and Murder Charge(Jul 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Amarick Gill Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.3 parties avg	3.3	75%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Amarick Gill Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Partial	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Mohamad Yazid: Trafficking and Abetting Diamorphine Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 31 May 2016 Norasharee Bin Gous (Defendant)Lost	31 May 2016	Norasharee Bin Gous (Defendant): Guilty as chargedFound guilty of abetting, by instigation, Yazid to traffic in not less than 120.90g of diamorphine.
2	Public Prosecutor v Micheal Anak Garing: Sentencing for Murder with Common Intention 19 Apr 2015 TONY ANAK IMBA (Defendant)Partial	19 Apr 2015	TONY ANAK IMBA (Defendant): PartialSentenced to imprisonment for life and 24 strokes of the cane.
3	Public Prosecutor v Micheal Anak Garing: Joint Intention in Fatal Robbery 19 Jan 2014 TONY ANAK IMBA (Defendant)Lost	19 Jan 2014	TONY ANAK IMBA (Defendant): Guilty as chargedFound guilty as charged and convicted accordingly.
4	PP v Fazely bin Rahmat: Unlawful Assembly, Common Object, and Murder Charge 07 Jul 2002 Fazely Bin Rahmat (Defendant)Lost	07 Jul 2002	Fazely Bin Rahmat (Defendant): Guilty of RiotingFound guilty of rioting under Section 147 of the Penal Code and sentenced to five years imprisonment and twelve strokes of the cane. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).