Amarick Singh Gill

Amarick Singh Gill is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and murder. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Murder	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Consequences of Prosecution’s non-disclosure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Discovery Obligations	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Re-sentencing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Joint Criminal Enterprise	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amarick Singh Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Amarick Singh Gill has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Amarick Gill & Co	2 cases	50% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Phuthita Somchit: Trafficking Diamorphine Conspiracy Case(Mar 2011) Daniel Vijay v PP: Joint Murder Charge & Common Intention in Robbery(Sep 2010)
Trident Law Corporation	1 cases	25% of cases	Muhammad bin Kadar v PP: Re-Sentencing for Murder under Penal Code s 302(Sep 2014)
Amarick Gill LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Govindasamy: Culpable Homicide Conviction for Death by Fire(Apr 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Amarick Singh Gill's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	23.5 parties avg	3.5	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Amarick Singh Gill's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	2(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Govindasamy: Culpable Homicide Conviction for Death by Fire 18 Apr 2016 Govindasamy s/o Nallaiah (Defendant)Lost	18 Apr 2016	Govindasamy s/o Nallaiah (Defendant): LostConvicted of culpable homicide and sentenced to 10 years of imprisonment.
2	Muhammad bin Kadar v PP: Re-Sentencing for Murder under Penal Code s 302 28 Sep 2014 Muhammad bin Kadar (Applicant)Lost	28 Sep 2014	Muhammad bin Kadar (Applicant): Application DismissedThe application for re-sentencing was dismissed, and the original death sentence was affirmed.
3	Public Prosecutor v Phuthita Somchit: Trafficking Diamorphine Conspiracy Case 24 Mar 2011 Phuthita Somchit (Defendant)Partial	24 Mar 2011	Phuthita Somchit (Defendant): Acquitted of main charge, convicted of attempting to traffic a Class C drugAcquitted of the charge under s 5(1)(a) read with s 5(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act, but convicted under s 175(2) of the CPC for attempting to traffic a Class C drug.
4	Daniel Vijay v PP: Joint Murder Charge & Common Intention in Robbery 02 Sep 2010 Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan (Appellant)Partial	02 Sep 2010	Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartMurder conviction set aside; convicted of robbery with hurt under Section 394 of the Penal Code read with Section 34.