Amerjeet Singh

Amerjeet Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in child custody and child support. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Amerjeet Singh has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in child custody and child support.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Child Custody	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amerjeet Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amerjeet Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Amerjeet Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amerjeet Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amerjeet Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Amerjeet Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Amerjeet Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Amerjeet Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Amerjeet Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Amerjeet Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Amerjeet Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amerjeet Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amerjeet Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amerjeet Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Amerjeet Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Amerjeet Singh has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Hoh Law Corporation	1 cases	33% of cases	Tay Boon Cheng Gina v Goh Ah Poo: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance in Divorce(Oct 2012)
CrossBorders LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	MST Ruma Khatun v T & Zee Engineering: Work Injury Compensation & Insurer Liability(May 2017)
Francis Khoo and Lim	1 cases	33% of cases	Midlink v Stansfield: Tenancy Agreement Dispute over Silence as Acceptance(Aug 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Amerjeet Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Amerjeet Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	682,928.08	341,464.042 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	MST Ruma Khatun v T & Zee Engineering: Work Injury Compensation & Insurer Liability 22 May 2017 MST Ruma Khatun (Applicant)Won	22 May 2017	MST Ruma Khatun (Applicant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the decision of the AC that the policy issued by Liberty was not engaged because of the Tiler Objection was set aside. Liberty to pay costs of $3,000 plus reasonable disbursements to the appellant for this appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Tay Boon Cheng Gina v Goh Ah Poo: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance in Divorce 28 Oct 2012 Goh Ah Poo (Defendant)Neutral	28 Oct 2012	Goh Ah Poo (Defendant): Joint custody of children grantedJoint custody of the children granted.
3	Midlink v Stansfield: Tenancy Agreement Dispute over Silence as Acceptance 19 Aug 2004 Midlink Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	19 Aug 2004	Midlink Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment was granted in the plaintiff’s favour for the sum of $679,928.08 (being $824,031.81 less the security deposit of $86,457.37 and part payment of rent of $57,646.36) with damages for the month of June 2004 to be assessed by the registrar. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.