Amolat Singh

Amolat Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 24 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 13.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Amolat Singh has demonstrated expertise across 35 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	22 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 22 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	19 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 19 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	15 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	9 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	8 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	8 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Appeal	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Nuisance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stamp Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Controlled Drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diplomatic Relations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of Rental	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Amolat Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Amolat Singh has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 23 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Amolat & Partners	23 cases	96% of cases	A Steven s/o Paul Raj v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking in Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(May 2022) Public Prosecutor v A Steven s/o Paul Raj: Trafficking in Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Sep 2021) Public Prosecutor v Shah Putra bin Samsuddin: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2018)
Assigned	1 cases	4% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Nagaenthran: Importation of Diamorphine & Defence of Duress(Jan 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Amolat Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	192.3 parties avg	2.3	79%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Won	32.5 parties avg	2.5	13%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	42.8 parties avg	2.8
2017	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Amolat Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	19(79%)	79%
Partial	2(8%)	8%
Won	3(13%)	13%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%)
2017	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 24 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	A Steven s/o Paul Raj v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking in Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 10 May 2022 A Steven s/o Paul Raj (Appellant)Lost	10 May 2022	A Steven s/o Paul Raj (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction and sentence was dismissed.
2	Public Prosecutor v A Steven s/o Paul Raj: Trafficking in Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 21 Sep 2021 A Steven s/o Paul Raj (Defendant)Lost	21 Sep 2021	A Steven s/o Paul Raj (Defendant): ConvictedAccused convicted of trafficking in diamorphine and sentenced to death.
3	Public Prosecutor v Shah Putra bin Samsuddin: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Nov 2018 Shah Putra bin Samsuddin (Defendant)Lost	29 Nov 2018	Shah Putra bin Samsuddin (Defendant): GuiltyThe Defendant was found guilty of the charge.
4	PP v Tan Kay Yong: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 20 Mar 2018 Mazlan bin Yusoff (Defendant)Lost	20 Mar 2018	Mazlan bin Yusoff (Defendant): ConvictedMazlan bin Yusoff was convicted of trafficking in a Class A controlled drug (diamorphine) and sentenced to life imprisonment.
5	Hishamrudin bin Mohd v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Jul 2017 Hishamrudin bin Mohd (Appellant)Lost	02 Jul 2017	Hishamrudin bin Mohd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence for drug trafficking was dismissed.
6	Public Prosecutor v Abdul Wahid Bin Ismail: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 19 Apr 2017 Abdul Wahid Bin Ismail (Defendant)Lost	19 Apr 2017	Abdul Wahid Bin Ismail (Defendant): ConvictedThe accused was found guilty and convicted of the charge and sentenced to death.
7	Public Prosecutor v. Morgan Kupusamy: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act 21 Feb 2017 Morgan Kupusamy (Defendant)Lost	21 Feb 2017	Morgan Kupusamy (Defendant): Life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the caneAccused was sentenced to life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
8	PP v Hamidah Binte Awang: Drug Trafficking - Misuse of Drugs Act Sentencing 15 Oct 2015 Hamidah Binte Awang (Defendant)Lost	15 Oct 2015	Hamidah Binte Awang (Defendant): Life ImprisonmentThe defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment.
9	PP v Khartik Jasudass: Trafficking Diamorphine - Common Intention & Knowledge of Drugs 02 Aug 2015 Puniyamurthy A/L Maruthai (Defendant)Lost	02 Aug 2015	Puniyamurthy A/L Maruthai (Defendant): GuiltyConvicted of trafficking in a controlled drug, namely diamorphine.
10	PP v Muhammad Farid: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Adverse Inference 10 Mar 2015 Muhammad Farid bin Mohd Yusop (Respondent)Partial	10 Mar 2015	Muhammad Farid bin Mohd Yusop (Respondent): Convicted on Amended ChargeThe respondent was convicted on the amended charge of possessing 249.99g of Ice for the purpose of trafficking.
11	PP v Hamidah & Ilechukwu: Drug Trafficking - Knowledge of Drugs, Misuse of Drugs Act 07 Jan 2015 Hamidah Binte Awang (Defendant)Lost	07 Jan 2015	Hamidah Binte Awang (Defendant): ConvictedHamidah was convicted of attempting to export not less than 1,963.3g of methamphetamine.
12	PP v Muhammad Farid: Trafficking in Methamphetamine & Knowledge of Drug Quantity 29 Jun 2014 Muhammad Farid bin Mohd Yusop (Defendant)Partial	29 Jun 2014	Muhammad Farid bin Mohd Yusop (Defendant): PartialConvicted on amended charge of possessing a lesser amount of methamphetamine for trafficking; sentenced to 23 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
13	Azman bin Mohamed Sanwan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking - Admissibility of Confession 05 Mar 2012 Azman bin Mohamed Sanwan (Appellant)Won	05 Mar 2012	Azman bin Mohamed Sanwan (Appellant): Conviction Set AsideThe Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and set aside the appellant's conviction.
14	Nagaenthran v PP: Knowledge of Drug Nature & Duress in Drug Importation 26 Sep 2011 Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam (Appellant)Lost	26 Sep 2011	Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence for drug importation was dismissed. Assumed currency is SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
15	Lai Ling Wan v Commissioner of Stamp Duties: Stamp Duty on Purchase of Multiple Property Units 04 Aug 2011 Lai Ling Wan (alias Lai Lily) (Appellant)Won	04 Aug 2011	Lai Ling Wan (alias Lai Lily) (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the assessment of stamp duty was allowed.
16	Public Prosecutor v Nagaenthran: Importation of Diamorphine & Defence of Duress 18 Jan 2011 Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam (Defendant)Lost	18 Jan 2011	Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam (Defendant): ConvictedThe defendant was convicted of the offence charged.
17	Public Prosecutor v Dinesh Pillai: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 13 Apr 2010 Dinesh Pillai a/l Raja Retnam (Defendant)Lost	13 Apr 2010	Dinesh Pillai a/l Raja Retnam (Defendant): Guilty as chargedAccused found guilty and sentenced to death.
18	Public Prosecutor v Gelau Anak Jimbat: Culpable Homicide Sentencing 22 Nov 2006 Gelau Anak Jimbat (Defense)Lost	22 Nov 2006	Gelau Anak Jimbat (Defense): ConvictedThe accused was sentenced to ten years imprisonment and six strokes of the cane.
19	Hu Su Chu v Wee Ek Chian: Nuisance Claim & Damages Assessment for Water Leakage 24 Apr 2006 Wee Ek Chian (Respondent, Defendant)Won	24 Apr 2006	Wee Ek Chian (Respondent, Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; the appeal was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Rusli Bin Sembayang v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Cannabis and Retracted Confession 11 Mar 2003 Rusli Bin Sembayang (Appellant)Lost	11 Mar 2003	Rusli Bin Sembayang (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction for trafficking cannabis was dismissed.
21	PP v Rusli bin Sembayang: Trafficking in Cannabis & Possession for Trafficking Purposes 30 Dec 2002 Rusli Bin Sembayang (Defendant)Lost	30 Dec 2002	Rusli Bin Sembayang (Defendant): GuiltyThe defendant was found guilty of the charge.
22	PP v Mohamed Abdul Nasser & Ashok Kumar Giri: Trafficking of Cannabis 25 Apr 2001 Ashok Kumar Giri (Defendant)Lost	25 Apr 2001	Ashok Kumar Giri (Defendant): Guilty as chargedThe second accused was found guilty as charged and sentenced to suffer death (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
23	Public Prosecutor v Solaiyan Arumugam: Rape and Molest Case 25 Apr 2001 Solaiyan Arumugam (Defense)Lost	25 Apr 2001	Solaiyan Arumugam (Defense): Accused found guiltyAccused was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane in respect the first charge and two years imprisonment and two strokes of the cane in respect of the third charge. The sentence of imprisonment in respect of the second charge should be served concurrently with that of the first.
24	Syed Yasser Arafat v PP: Trafficking of Diamorphine & Presumption of Possession 23 Aug 2000 Syed Yasser Arafat bin Shaik Mohamed (Appellant)Lost	23 Aug 2000	Syed Yasser Arafat bin Shaik Mohamed (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld.