Amy Tan

Amy Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and judgments and orders.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Amy Tan has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Order	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bank Guarantee	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Writ of Seizure and Sale	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Service of Process	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Default Judgment	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Amy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Amy Tan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kelvin Chia Partnership	2 cases	67% of cases	CAA Technologies v HP Construction: Wrongful Termination & Banker's Guarantee Dispute(Jan 2015) Terrestrial Pte Ltd v Allgo Marine Pte Ltd: Dispute over Breach of Contract and Service of Writ(Mar 2013)
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	KLW Holdings Ltd v Straitsworld Advisory Ltd: Seizure and Sale of Club Membership(Aug 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Amy Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Amy Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	952,993.81	476,496.912 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	KLW Holdings Ltd v Straitsworld Advisory Ltd: Seizure and Sale of Club Membership 13 Aug 2017 KLW Holdings Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	13 Aug 2017	KLW Holdings Limited (Plaintiff): Application for writ of seizure and sale refusedThe court refused the Plaintiff's application for a writ of seizure and sale to be issued in respect of the 2nd Defendant’s membership at the Singapore Island Country Club.
2	CAA Technologies v HP Construction: Wrongful Termination & Banker's Guarantee Dispute 27 Jan 2015 HP Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	27 Jan 2015	HP Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim Allowed in PartDefendant's counterclaim allowed in part; awarded $952,993.81 for additional costs to complete, payments made on behalf of the plaintiff, and rectification works. Liquidated damages claim disallowed.
3	Terrestrial Pte Ltd v Allgo Marine Pte Ltd: Dispute over Breach of Contract and Service of Writ 05 Mar 2013 Terrestrial Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	05 Mar 2013	Terrestrial Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; Default Judgment set aside with conditions. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.