Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar

Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in judicial review and legal ethics and professional responsibility. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in judicial review and legal ethics and professional responsibility.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Judicial Review	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's undertaking	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Oral contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Loans	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Pathway Law Practice LLP	2 cases	40% of cases	Law Society v Naidu Priyalatha: Breach of Solicitor's Undertaking & Professional Misconduct(Sep 2022) Sinniah Karupaiah v Kumanaruban Rasiah: Oral Loan Agreements & Inter Vivos Gifts Dispute(Apr 2021)
Frontier Law Corporation	2 cases	40% of cases	Ung Yoke Hooi v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Property Seizure under Criminal Procedure Code(Apr 2009) Mohamed Nizam v Sadique Marican: Summary Judgment, Extension of Time, and Waiver of Irregularity(Oct 2008)
Intelleigen Legal LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	Mohd Sadique v Law Society: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal Decisions(May 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	60%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	100,000.00	25,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Law Society v Naidu Priyalatha: Breach of Solicitor's Undertaking & Professional Misconduct 15 Sep 2022 Naidu Priyalatha (Respondent)Lost	15 Sep 2022	Naidu Priyalatha (Respondent): Suspension ImposedThe Respondent was suspended for three months. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
2	Sinniah Karupaiah v Kumanaruban Rasiah: Oral Loan Agreements & Inter Vivos Gifts Dispute 11 Apr 2021 Sinniah Karupaiah (Plaintiff)Partial	11 Apr 2021	Sinniah Karupaiah (Plaintiff): Claim allowed in partPlaintiff's claim for S$100,000 allowed with interest. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
3	Mohd Sadique v Law Society: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal Decisions 12 May 2010 Mohd Sadique bin Ibrahim Marican (Applicant)Lost	12 May 2010	Mohd Sadique bin Ibrahim Marican (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for leave to seek a quashing order was dismissed; costs to be paid by the applicants to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Ung Yoke Hooi v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Property Seizure under Criminal Procedure Code 12 Apr 2009 Ung Yoke Hooi (Appellant)Lost	12 Apr 2009	Ung Yoke Hooi (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed on the ground that the court is not in a position to direct CPIB to release the accounts.
5	Mohamed Nizam v Sadique Marican: Summary Judgment, Extension of Time, and Waiver of Irregularity 28 Oct 2008 Sadique Marican bin Ibrahim Marican (Defendant, Appellant)Won	28 Oct 2008	Sadique Marican bin Ibrahim Marican (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the court held that the Assistant Registrar's decision to extend time for service was correct (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).