Anand s/o K Thiagarajan

Anand s/o K Thiagarajan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in intellectual property law and trademarks. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Debt Repayment Scheme	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trade names	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Infringement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Detinue	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy to Injure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Anand s/o K Thiagarajan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
AKT Legal Chambers	2 cases	67% of cases	Madina Beevi v M Akbar: Bankruptcy Order Appeal Based on IRDA s 316(3)(e)(Aug 2024) Dr. Who Waterworks v. Dr. Who (M) Sdn Bhd: Trademark Infringement & Passing Off Dispute(May 2023)
Anand T & Co	1 cases	33% of cases	Panatron v Lee Cheow Lee: Conspiracy, Breach of Contract, and Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Coating Business(Oct 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Anand s/o K Thiagarajan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.3
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	28.2 parties avg	8.2	67%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Anand s/o K Thiagarajan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,000.00	4,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Madina Beevi v M Akbar: Bankruptcy Order Appeal Based on IRDA s 316(3)(e) 01 Aug 2024 Madina Beevi Abdul Jameel (Respondent, Claimant)Won	01 Aug 2024	Madina Beevi Abdul Jameel (Respondent, Claimant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the respondent fixed at $8,000 all-in (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Dr. Who Waterworks v. Dr. Who (M) Sdn Bhd: Trademark Infringement & Passing Off Dispute 25 May 2023 Dr. Who (M) Sdn Bhd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Lost	25 May 2023	Dr. Who (M) Sdn Bhd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Unsuccessful on most counterclaimsUnsuccessful on most counterclaims. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Panatron v Lee Cheow Lee: Conspiracy, Breach of Contract, and Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Coating Business 10 Oct 2000 Panatron Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Oct 2000	Panatron Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claims dismissedPanatron's claims against the defendants are dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.