Andre Jumabhoy

Andre Jumabhoy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Dishonest receipt of stolen property	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Academic Dishonesty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Power	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andre Jumabhoy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Andre Jumabhoy has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	4 cases	80% of cases	Chua Boon Chye v Public Prosecutor: Dishonest Receipt of Stolen Marine Fuel Oil(Jul 2014) Tey Tsun Hang v Public Prosecutor: Corruption, Gifts, and Academic Favoritism at National University of Singapore(Feb 2014) Mohammad Faizal v PP: Constitutionality of Enhanced Drug Penalties(Aug 2012)
Peter Low & Choo LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	PP v Yeo Liang Hou: Trafficking in Methamphetamine & Admissibility of Statements(May 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Andre Jumabhoy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Andre Jumabhoy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Yeo Liang Hou: Trafficking in Methamphetamine & Admissibility of Statements 28 May 2023 Nagaiah Rao a/l Alumanar (Defendant)Partial	28 May 2023	Nagaiah Rao a/l Alumanar (Defendant): ConvictedNagaiah was found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment and caning.
2	Chua Boon Chye v Public Prosecutor: Dishonest Receipt of Stolen Marine Fuel Oil 14 Jul 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	14 Jul 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
3	Tey Tsun Hang v Public Prosecutor: Corruption, Gifts, and Academic Favoritism at National University of Singapore 27 Feb 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	27 Feb 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; convictions set aside. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Mohammad Faizal v PP: Constitutionality of Enhanced Drug Penalties 09 Aug 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	09 Aug 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Stated Question answered in the negativeThe court found the law constitutional and within the powers of the Legislature.
5	Amazi bin Hawasi v Public Prosecutor: Constitutionality of s 33A(5)(a) of Misuse of Drugs Act 09 Aug 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	09 Aug 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Question answered in the negativeThe court determined that section 33A(5)(a) of the Misuse of Drugs Act does not violate the principle of separation of powers.