Andrew Ang

Andrew Ang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in scheme of arrangement and building and construction contracts. Their track record shows a 18.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 18% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Andrew Ang has demonstrated expertise across 38 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	10 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Running Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commodities Trading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Expense Claims	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Scheme of Arrangement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reflective Loss	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Exchange Control Regulations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Off-shore Banking	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Currency Speculation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Andrew Ang has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
PK Wong & Associates LLC	5 cases	45% of cases	Sintalow Hardware v OSK Engineering: Contract Formation & Misrepresentation Dispute(Apr 2017) Mitfam v Motley: Dispute over Cashew Nut Payments and Contract Breach(Dec 2013) Nanyang Law LLC v Alphomega Research Group Ltd: Security for Costs Application in Minority Oppression Suit(May 2011)
Rajah & Tann	4 cases	36% of cases	Hengwell Development v Thing Chiang Ching: Application for Leave to Sue under Companies Act(Jul 2003) Gladioli Investments v Montien International: Interpretation of Conflicting Interest Clauses in Sale Agreement(Jul 2003) Hengwell v Thing Chiang Ching: Representative Action for Misappropriation of Funds(Jul 2002)
P K Wong & Associates LLC	1 cases	9% of cases	Piattchanine v Phosagro Asia: Wrongful Termination & Expense Claims Dispute(Oct 2015)
PK Wong and Associates LLC	1 cases	9% of cases	Eastern Pretech v Kin Lin Builders: Winding Up Order & Scheme of Arrangement(Sep 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Andrew Ang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 2 (18%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	53.6 parties avg	3.6	45%
Neutral	111.0 parties avg	11.0	9%
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	27%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	18%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2004	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Andrew Ang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(45%)	45%
Neutral	1(9%)	9%
Partial	3(27%)	27%
Won	2(18%)	18%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.005 cases	5
USD	14,586.48	14,586.481 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sintalow Hardware v OSK Engineering: Contract Formation & Misrepresentation Dispute 26 Apr 2017 OSK Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	26 Apr 2017	OSK Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal Partially UpheldAppeal partially upheld; OSK found liable for breach of contract for failing to take delivery of certain products. OSK to pay 70% of Sintalow's costs. (Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore).
2	Piattchanine v Phosagro Asia: Wrongful Termination & Expense Claims Dispute 08 Oct 2015 PHOSAGRO ASIA PTE LTD (Defendant)Partial	08 Oct 2015	PHOSAGRO ASIA PTE LTD (Defendant): Counterclaim succeeds in partDefendant's counterclaim succeeds in respect of: (a) The claims in Category A totalling S$100,340.40. (b) The claims in Category B. (c) The claim for the St Regis spa service and other related spa services and treatments in Category D. (d) The claims in Category G for taxi services.
3	Mitfam v Motley: Dispute over Cashew Nut Payments and Contract Breach 15 Dec 2013 Motley Resources Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	15 Dec 2013	Motley Resources Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim allowed in partCounterclaim allowed in part for breach of contract, resulting in a US$14,586.48 setoff against the amount owed to the plaintiff.
4	Nanyang Law LLC v Alphomega Research Group Ltd: Security for Costs Application in Minority Oppression Suit 10 May 2011 Nanyang Law LLC (Plaintiff, 1st Defendant)Lost	10 May 2011	Nanyang Law LLC (Plaintiff, 1st Defendant): Application for security for costs dismissedApplication for security for costs dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Leighton Contractors v J-Power Systems: Performance Bond Call Dispute 11 Jan 2009 Leighton Contractors (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	11 Jan 2009	Leighton Contractors (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedThe application to restrain JPS and HSBC from receiving and making payment respectively under the Performance Bond is dismissed.
6	Tiong Seng Contractors v Chuan Lim Construction: Applicability of Security of Payment Act to Final Payment Claims 30 Aug 2007 Tiong Seng Contractors (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Aug 2007	Tiong Seng Contractors (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's attempt to set aside the Adjudication determination is dismissed.
7	Eastern Pretech v Kin Lin Builders: Winding Up Order & Scheme of Arrangement 02 Sep 2004 Deloitte and Touche (Liquidator)Neutral	02 Sep 2004	Deloitte and Touche (Liquidator): Winding up order not set asideLiquidator in the winding up petition; winding up order not set aside.
8	Hengwell Development v Thing Chiang Ching: Application for Leave to Sue under Companies Act 17 Jul 2003 Thing Chiang Ching (Defendant)Won	17 Jul 2003	Thing Chiang Ching (Defendant): Application DismissedApplication against the defendant dismissed due to procedural error.
9	Gladioli Investments v Montien International: Interpretation of Conflicting Interest Clauses in Sale Agreement 10 Jul 2003 Gladioli Investments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	10 Jul 2003	Gladioli Investments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; the court ruled in favor of the judgment debtor due to ambiguity in the interest clauses. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Hengwell v Thing Chiang Ching: Representative Action for Misappropriation of Funds 14 Jul 2002 Thing Chiang Ching (Defendant)Lost	14 Jul 2002	Thing Chiang Ching (Defendant): Application AllowedThe application to commence an action against the defendant was allowed.
11	Shenyin Wangou-APS v Commerzbank: Frustration of Contract & Exchange Control 04 Sep 2001 Commerzbank (South-East Asia) Ltd (Defendant)Won	04 Sep 2001	Commerzbank (South-East Asia) Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.