Andrew Goh

Andrew Goh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in damages and child custody. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 43% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Andrew Goh has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Double Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Collateral Benefits	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Quantification of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Court Dispute Resolution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Operational Losses	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Andrew Goh has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
De Souza Lim & Goh LLP	2 cases	29% of cases	WOZ v WOY: Appeal on Matrimonial Asset Valuation and Child Access Arrangements(Feb 2024) Epoch Minerals Pte Ltd v Raffles Asset Management: Cost Allocation in Fraudulent Inducement Case(Jan 2022)
Assomull and Partners	2 cases	29% of cases	ABC Supermarket v Kosma Holdings: Claim for Operational Losses Due to Defective Air-Conditioning(Feb 2005) Lo Lee Len v Grand Interior Renovation: Negligence, Damages & Double Recovery(Feb 2004)
Assomull & Partners	1 cases	14% of cases	Lock Han Chng Jonathan v Goh Jessiline: Jurisdiction of Settlement Judge in Court Dispute Resolution(Apr 2007)
Mark Goh & Co	1 cases	14% of cases	Ling Mang Khong Stanley v Teo Chee Siong: Striking Out Third Party Claim for Conspiracy & Contribution(Mar 2013)
Patrick Tan & Associates	1 cases	14% of cases	Checkpoint Fluidic Systems v Marine Hub: Agency, Indemnity & Third-Party Liability(Jun 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Andrew Goh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 3 (43%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	29%
Partial	33.0 parties avg	3.0	43%
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Andrew Goh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Partial	3(43%)	43%
Won	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	355,673.50	71,134.705 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	WOZ v WOY: Appeal on Matrimonial Asset Valuation and Child Access Arrangements 05 Feb 2024 WOZ (Appellant)Partial	05 Feb 2024	WOZ (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal regarding valuation of matrimonial property dismissed; liberty to apply for changes to access conditions granted.
2	Epoch Minerals Pte Ltd v Raffles Asset Management: Cost Allocation in Fraudulent Inducement Case 27 Jan 2022 Raffles Asset Management (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Jan 2022	Raffles Asset Management (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Costs awarded againstCosts of $300,000 plus disbursements awarded against the second to fourth defendants jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ling Mang Khong Stanley v Teo Chee Siong: Striking Out Third Party Claim for Conspiracy & Contribution 06 Mar 2013 Ling Mang Khong Stanley (Plaintiff)Partial	06 Mar 2013	Ling Mang Khong Stanley (Plaintiff): Claim struck out in Registrar’s Appeal No 165 of 2010, but successful in appeal against that decisionThe plaintiff's claim was initially struck out but later reinstated on appeal.
4	Checkpoint Fluidic Systems v Marine Hub: Agency, Indemnity & Third-Party Liability 02 Jun 2009 Checkpoint Fluidic Systems International Ltd (Appellant)Lost	02 Jun 2009	Checkpoint Fluidic Systems International Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
5	Lock Han Chng Jonathan v Goh Jessiline: Jurisdiction of Settlement Judge in Court Dispute Resolution 26 Apr 2007 Goh Jessiline (Defendant, Appellant)Won	26 Apr 2007	Goh Jessiline (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs to be taxed unless otherwise agreed. The Order of Court is set aside together with the execution proceedings in writ of seizure and sale no. 2057 of 2006. The plaintiff is ordered to reimburse the defendant all costs and disbursements paid by the defendant towards the Order of Court and the writ of seizure and sale, with interest at 6% from the date of the defendant’s payment until date of refund. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	ABC Supermarket v Kosma Holdings: Claim for Operational Losses Due to Defective Air-Conditioning 27 Feb 2005 ABC Supermarket Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	27 Feb 2005	ABC Supermarket Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, damages increased to $54,623.50, including rectification costs and compensation for additional losses. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Lo Lee Len v Grand Interior Renovation: Negligence, Damages & Double Recovery 09 Feb 2004 Grand Interior Renovation Works Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	09 Feb 2004	Grand Interior Renovation Works Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the respondent for $450 (policy excess) and $600 (loss of use). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.