Andrew Hanam

Andrew Hanam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in maintenance and matrimonial assets. Their track record shows a 11.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Andrew Hanam has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Family Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equitable Accounting	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loss of future earnings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dependency Claim	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Deed of Separation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loss of Earning Capacity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Court Dispute Resolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Claim	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Revocation of Driving Licence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Computers and Software	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Andrew Hanam has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Andrew LLC	4 cases	44% of cases	TYA v TYB: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Variation of Maintenance Order(Dec 2017) Sulastri Bte Achmad v Tan Hee Hang: Dependency Claim & Damages for Fatal Road Accident(Feb 2017) ANX v ANY: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Enforceability of Deed of Separation in Divorce(Nov 2014)
Andrew & Co	3 cases	33% of cases	Teo Chin Lam v Lead Management Engineering: Res Judicata in Construction Subcontract Dispute(Jan 2009) NTUC Income v Toh Kheng Boon: Motor Insurance, Use for Reward & Amendment of Pleadings(Jul 2007) Lock Han Chng Jonathan v Goh Jessiline: Jurisdiction of Settlement Judge in Court Dispute Resolution(Apr 2007)
Attorneys Inc	1 cases	11% of cases	Ong Zern Chern Philip v Wong Siang Meng: Damages for Road Traffic Accident Injuries and Loss of Earning Capacity(Nov 2004)
Hanam & Co	1 cases	11% of cases	Kang Ngah Wei v Commander of Traffic Police: Certiorari Application for Driving Licence Revocation(Jan 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Andrew Hanam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.0 parties avg	2.0	44%
Partial	42.3 parties avg	2.3	44%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	11%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Andrew Hanam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(44%)	44%
Partial	4(44%)	44%
Won	1(11%)	11%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	130,518.59	21,753.106 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	TYA v TYB: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Variation of Maintenance Order 17 Dec 2017 TYA (Appellant)Partial	17 Dec 2017	TYA (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partClause 3(a) is to be varied in the terms stated at [51] above (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Sulastri Bte Achmad v Tan Hee Hang: Dependency Claim & Damages for Fatal Road Accident 06 Feb 2017 Sulastri Bte Achmad (Plaintiff)Partial	06 Feb 2017	Sulastri Bte Achmad (Plaintiff): Partial JudgmentInterlocutory judgment was entered against the defendants for 95% of the damages assessed as due to Mdm Sulastri for her dependency claim. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	ANX v ANY: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Enforceability of Deed of Separation in Divorce 24 Nov 2014 ANX (Plaintiff)Partial	24 Nov 2014	ANX (Plaintiff): Deed of Separation upheld in partDeed of Separation upheld regarding Aston Mansion and maintenance, but the court awarded the wife 8% of the remaining matrimonial assets (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Hanam v Lam: Easement Dispute over Party Wall Leakage at Thomson Green 20 Aug 2013 Andrew John Hanam (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Aug 2013	Andrew John Hanam (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's originating summons seeking access to the defendant's property for inspection and repairs was dismissed.
5	Teo Chin Lam v Lead Management Engineering: Res Judicata in Construction Subcontract Dispute 19 Jan 2009 Teo Chin Lam (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	19 Jan 2009	Teo Chin Lam (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, and the plaintiff's claim was struck out.
6	NTUC Income v Toh Kheng Boon: Motor Insurance, Use for Reward & Amendment of Pleadings 22 Jul 2007 Toh Kheng Boon (Respondent)Partial	22 Jul 2007	Toh Kheng Boon (Respondent): Appeal partially successfulMr Toh is awarded 50% of the costs of the appeal.
7	Lock Han Chng Jonathan v Goh Jessiline: Jurisdiction of Settlement Judge in Court Dispute Resolution 26 Apr 2007 Lock Han Chng Jonathan (Jonathan Luo Hancheng) (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	26 Apr 2007	Lock Han Chng Jonathan (Jonathan Luo Hancheng) (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal was allowed with costs to be taxed unless otherwise agreed. The plaintiff was ordered to reimburse the defendant all costs and disbursements paid by the defendant towards the Order of Court and the writ of seizure and sale, with interest at 6% from the date of the defendant’s payment until date of refund. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Ong Zern Chern Philip v Wong Siang Meng: Damages for Road Traffic Accident Injuries and Loss of Earning Capacity 11 Nov 2004 Ong Zern Chern Philip (Plaintiff)Won	11 Nov 2004	Ong Zern Chern Philip (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $130,518.59 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Kang Ngah Wei v Commander of Traffic Police: Certiorari Application for Driving Licence Revocation 06 Jan 2002 Kang Ngah Wei (Applicant)Lost	06 Jan 2002	Kang Ngah Wei (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for leave to apply for an order of certiorari is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.