Andrew Heng

Andrew Heng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and injunctions. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Andrew Heng has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and corporate law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Heng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Andrew Heng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andrew Heng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Heng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Heng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andrew Heng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Heng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew Heng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andrew Heng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Heng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Heng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent misrepresentation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew Heng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Andrew Heng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew Heng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew Heng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrew Heng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew Heng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Heng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Andrew Heng has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Straits Law Practice LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	National University Hospital v Cicada Cube: Patent Ownership Dispute over Laboratory Specimen Collection System(Mar 2017) Tan Swee Wan v Lian Tian Yong Johnny: Striking Out Pleadings in Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim(Sep 2016) Neptune Capital v Sunmax: Damages for Injunction & Undertaking Breach(Jul 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Andrew Heng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	110.0 parties avg	10.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	26.5 parties avg	6.5
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Andrew Heng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	National University Hospital v Cicada Cube: Patent Ownership Dispute over Laboratory Specimen Collection System 13 Mar 2017 Cicada Cube Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	13 Mar 2017	Cicada Cube Pte Ltd (Defendant): Partial JudgmentCicada Cube was named as a joint proprietor of the Patent together with NUH.
2	Tan Swee Wan v Lian Tian Yong Johnny: Striking Out Pleadings in Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim 27 Sep 2016 Johnny Lian Tian Yong (Defendant, Appellant)Won	27 Sep 2016	Johnny Lian Tian Yong (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Paragraph 26(d) of the SOC was struck out. Costs of S$5,000 (excluding reasonable disbursements) to be paid by the Plaintiffs to the Defendant. Costs of S$2,400 ordered by the AR for the hearing below and previously paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiffs was to be returned to the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Neptune Capital v Sunmax: Damages for Injunction & Undertaking Breach 27 Jul 2016 CHINA DATA SYSTEM INVESTMENTS PTE LTD (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Jul 2016	CHINA DATA SYSTEM INVESTMENTS PTE LTD (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claims were struck out and they were found jointly and severally liable to pay damages to the defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).