Andrew Ho

Andrew Ho is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in easements and enforcement of foreign judgments. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Andrew Ho has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Easements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Forensic Accounting	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Andrew Ho has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Engelin Teh Practice LLC	2 cases	33% of cases	Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd v Nordic International Ltd: Dispute over Arbitration Rights in Joint Venture(Jul 2014) Ong Jane Rebecca v PricewaterhouseCoopers: Professional Negligence Claim(Sep 2011)
Drew and Napier LLC	1 cases	17% of cases	Chia Kin Tuck v Leong Choon Kum: Claim for Money Had and Received Dispute(Jan 2005)
Sam Koh & Co	1 cases	17% of cases	Ong Jane Rebecca v Pricewaterhousecoopers: Security for Costs & Access to Courts(Feb 2009)
Braddell Brothers	1 cases	17% of cases	Frontfield v MCST 938: Easement Extinguishment for Right of Way Abandonment(Jun 2001)
Braddell Bros	1 cases	17% of cases	Wu Shun Foods v Ken Ken Food: Enforcing Foreign Judgments & Contract Illegality(Aug 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Andrew Ho's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Lost	32.3 parties avg	2.3	50%
Partial	23.5 parties avg	3.5	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Andrew Ho's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(17%)	17%
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Partial	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,000,000.00	500,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd v Nordic International Ltd: Dispute over Arbitration Rights in Joint Venture 08 Jul 2014 Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	08 Jul 2014	Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application for summary judgment was dismissed.
2	Ong Jane Rebecca v PricewaterhouseCoopers: Professional Negligence Claim 13 Sep 2011 Ong Jane Rebecca (Plaintiff)Partial	13 Sep 2011	Ong Jane Rebecca (Plaintiff): Partial compliance orderedFirst week of trial dates vacated; new directions issued with 'unless' orders.
3	Ong Jane Rebecca v Pricewaterhousecoopers: Security for Costs & Access to Courts 05 Feb 2009 Ong Jane Rebecca (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	05 Feb 2009	Ong Jane Rebecca (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartSecurity for costs reduced. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Chia Kin Tuck v Leong Choon Kum: Claim for Money Had and Received Dispute 03 Jan 2005 Chua Lan (Defendant, Respondent, Appellant)Lost	03 Jan 2005	Chua Lan (Defendant, Respondent, Appellant): Appeals dismissed; ordered to return $1 million with interestAppeals dismissed; ordered to return $1 million with interest to the plaintiff's solicitors, pending resolution of beneficial ownership. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Wu Shun Foods v Ken Ken Food: Enforcing Foreign Judgments & Contract Illegality 11 Aug 2002 Ken Ken Food Manufacturing Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	11 Aug 2002	Ken Ken Food Manufacturing Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedThe defendant's application to strike out the plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
6	Frontfield v MCST 938: Easement Extinguishment for Right of Way Abandonment 29 Jun 2001 Management Corporation Strata Title No 938 (Defendant)Lost	29 Jun 2001	Management Corporation Strata Title No 938 (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court declared that the right of way over the servient tenement has been abandoned by the owners of Gracious Mansions.