Andrew J Hanam

Andrew J Hanam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in employment law and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 6% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated expertise across 60 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	12 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Lis alibi pendens	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Illegality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dependency Claim	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investment Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Economic Duress	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducing Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loans	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Whiplash Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of Earning Capacity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bribery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Overseas Test Centres	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vendor and Purchaser	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diplomatic Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Single Economic Unit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew J Hanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Andrew J Hanam has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Andrew LLC	8 cases	50% of cases	P & P Engineering v Kori Construction: Breach of Contract & Damages Dispute(Dec 2018) Eastern Resource Management Services Ltd v Chiu Teng Construction Co Pte Ltd: Contractual Terms, Consideration, Economic Duress(Jun 2016) Virsagi Management v Welltech Construction: Lis Alibi Pendens, Forum Non Conveniens & Overseas Training Center Dispute(Sep 2013)
Andrew & Co	2 cases	13% of cases	Chee Jok Heng Stephanie v Chang Yue Shoon: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Recovery of Funds(May 2010) Sin Yong v United Engineers: Illegality & Enforceability of Contracts Affected by Bribery(Mar 2008)
PK Wong and Advani	2 cases	13% of cases	Chen Con-Ling Tony v Quay Properties: Vendor's Duty to Consult Purchaser on Tenancy Termination(Feb 2004) Zhang Xiao Ling v Er Swee Poo: Dependency Claim for Fatal Accident(Feb 2004)
Hanam & Co	2 cases	13% of cases	Abdul Latif v Saeed Husain: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Employee Competition(Jan 2003) SH Sameyeh Pte Ltd v Hassan's Carpets Pte Ltd: Consignment Agreement Dispute(Jul 2001)
Edmond Pereira & Partners	1 cases	6% of cases	Noor Mohamed v Apollo Enterprises: Termination with Notice vs. Redundancy under Employment & Retirement Age Acts(Apr 2000)
Clifford Law Corporation	1 cases	6% of cases	Kamis bin Satari v Nasir Natarajan: Striking Out Claim Under Workmen's Compensation Act(Oct 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Andrew J Hanam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 1 (6%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	72.6 parties avg	2.6	44%
Partial	52.4 parties avg	2.4	31%
Won	52.2 parties avg	2.2	31%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Andrew J Hanam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(41%)	41%
Partial	5(29%)	29%
Won	5(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,498,331.51	149,833.1510 cases	10

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 16 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	P & P Engineering v Kori Construction: Breach of Contract & Damages Dispute 30 Dec 2018 P & P Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	30 Dec 2018	P & P Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; Kori Construction to verify and certify P & P Engineering's delivery orders and pay 80% of the costs of the action (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Eastern Resource Management Services Ltd v Chiu Teng Construction Co Pte Ltd: Contractual Terms, Consideration, Economic Duress 13 Jun 2016 Eastern Resource Management Services Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	13 Jun 2016	Eastern Resource Management Services Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed in totality and the Plaintiff is to pay the Defendant's costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Virsagi Management v Welltech Construction: Lis Alibi Pendens, Forum Non Conveniens & Overseas Training Center Dispute 24 Sep 2013 Virsagi Management (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	24 Sep 2013	Virsagi Management (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the court found that there was no lis alibi pendens but agreed that Bangladesh was the more appropriate forum. Costs awarded to the respondents.
4	Chang Mui Hoon v Lim Bee Leng: Road Accident, Whiplash Injury, PTSD, and Damages Assessment 19 Jun 2013 Chang Mui Hoon (Plaintiff)Won	19 Jun 2013	Chang Mui Hoon (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; total damages awarded in the amount of $131,258 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Thomas Teddy v Kuiper International: Tort of Conversion & Damages 09 Jan 2013 Thomas Teddy (Appellant)Partial	09 Jan 2013	Thomas Teddy (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partNominal damages of $1.00 awarded for tort of conversion from 2 to 7 September 2012 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Virsagi Management v Welltech Construction: Forum Non Conveniens & Lis Alibi Pendens in Overseas Training Centre Dispute 15 Oct 2012 Virsagi Management (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Oct 2012	Virsagi Management (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedVirsagi's application for an injunction was dismissed. Virsagi was ordered to pay costs for Summons 869 and Summons 895 to Badal/Gazipur and costs for Summons 829 to Welltech. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Ascorp Technology v Chew Youn Chong: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Corporate Opportunity 11 May 2011 Chew Youn Chong (Defendant)Partial	11 May 2011	Chew Youn Chong (Defendant): Counterclaim allowed in partCYC's counterclaim against Ascorp was granted in part for unpaid share of the profits due to him. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Chee Jok Heng Stephanie v Tan Kian Meng William: Loan Recovery & Property Investment Dispute 22 Jul 2010 Chee Jok Heng Stephanie (Plaintiff)Partial	22 Jul 2010	Chee Jok Heng Stephanie (Plaintiff): Claim Allowed in PartPlaintiff's claim for loan repayment and contribution for loss from One Tree Hill was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Chee Jok Heng Stephanie v Chang Yue Shoon: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Recovery of Funds 19 May 2010 Chee Jok Heng Stephanie (Plaintiff)Won	19 May 2010	Chee Jok Heng Stephanie (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; restitution of $45,000 and $682,000 ordered (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Sin Yong v United Engineers: Illegality & Enforceability of Contracts Affected by Bribery 24 Mar 2008 Sin Yong Contractor Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	24 Mar 2008	Sin Yong Contractor Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, setting aside the Senior Assistant Registrar's order. The court found that the case warranted a full trial.
11	Kamis bin Satari v Nasir Natarajan: Striking Out Claim Under Workmen's Compensation Act 02 Oct 2005 Kamis bin Satari (Appellant)Lost	02 Oct 2005	Kamis bin Satari (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
12	Chen Con-Ling Tony v Quay Properties: Vendor's Duty to Consult Purchaser on Tenancy Termination 18 Feb 2004 Chen Con-Ling Tony (Appellant)Lost	18 Feb 2004	Chen Con-Ling Tony (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed due to the appellant's unreasonable position and failure to prove actual loss.
13	Zhang Xiao Ling v Er Swee Poo: Dependency Claim for Fatal Accident 09 Feb 2004 Zhang Xiao Ling (personal representative of the Estate of Chan Tak Man, deceased) (Plaintiff)Won	09 Feb 2004	Zhang Xiao Ling (personal representative of the Estate of Chan Tak Man, deceased) (Plaintiff): Damages AwardedDamages awarded to the plaintiff in the amount of $332,942 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Abdul Latif v Saeed Husain: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Employee Competition 30 Jan 2003 Abdul Latif Bin Mohamed Tahiar (trading as Canary Agencies) (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	30 Jan 2003	Abdul Latif Bin Mohamed Tahiar (trading as Canary Agencies) (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; additional damages of $14,875 awarded for the combi component (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	SH Sameyeh Pte Ltd v Hassan's Carpets Pte Ltd: Consignment Agreement Dispute 10 Jul 2001 SH Sameyeh Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	10 Jul 2001	SH Sameyeh Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedThe plaintiffs' appeal was dismissed.
16	Noor Mohamed v Apollo Enterprises: Termination with Notice vs. Redundancy under Employment & Retirement Age Acts 10 Apr 2000 Noor Mohamed bin Mumtaz Shah (Appellant)Partial	10 Apr 2000	Noor Mohamed bin Mumtaz Shah (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in relation to the main claim for redundancy payment, but dismissed the appeal in respect of the claim for reimbursement for meals and telephone calls.