Ang Ming Sheng Terence

Ang Ming Sheng Terence is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in judicial review and compulsory acquisition. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ang Ming Sheng Terence has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in judicial review and administrative law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Judicial Review	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ang Ming Sheng Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ang Ming Sheng Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Land Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Ang Ming Sheng Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ang Ming Sheng Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Housing Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Ming Sheng Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ang Ming Sheng Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ang Ming Sheng Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ang Ming Sheng Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Compulsory Acquisition	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Ming Sheng Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ang Ming Sheng Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Ming Sheng Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Eminent Domain	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Ming Sheng Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ang Ming Sheng Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ang Ming Sheng Terence has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	100% of cases	Per Ah Seng Robin v HDB: HDB Flat Compulsory Acquisition for Unauthorized Subletting(Nov 2015) Tan Lip Tiong v Commissioner of Labour: Mental Capacity Act & Work Injury Compensation(Apr 2015) Per Ah Seng Robin v HDB: Quashing Order Refused for HDB's Compulsory Acquisition of Flat Due to Illegal Subletting(Dec 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ang Ming Sheng Terence's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Won	24.0 parties avg	4.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ang Ming Sheng Terence's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	15,000.00	15,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Per Ah Seng Robin v HDB: HDB Flat Compulsory Acquisition for Unauthorized Subletting 29 Nov 2015 The Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2015	The Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe HDB's decision to compulsorily acquire the flat was upheld.
2	Tan Lip Tiong v Commissioner of Labour: Mental Capacity Act & Work Injury Compensation 01 Apr 2015 The Commissioner of Labour (Respondent)Lost	01 Apr 2015	The Commissioner of Labour (Respondent): Application DismissedThe court held that the Commissioner's decision on 1 July 2014 was correctly made.
3	Per Ah Seng Robin v HDB: Quashing Order Refused for HDB's Compulsory Acquisition of Flat Due to Illegal Subletting 21 Dec 2014 Attorney-General’s Chambers (Respondent)Won	21 Dec 2014	Attorney-General’s Chambers (Respondent): Successful DefenceApplication for leave to file an application for a quashing order was dismissed. Applicants to pay costs of $15,000 to AGC. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.