Ang Sin Teck

Ang Sin Teck is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 8.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated expertise across 52 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	9 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	9 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Murder	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment by conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Intimidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Attempted Murder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Immigration Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causing Hurt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ang Sin Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ang Sin Teck has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Surian & Partners	3 cases	25% of cases	AAL v AAK: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Lump Sum Maintenance in Divorce(Jul 2012) Lim Pang Howe Harry v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Intimidation and Causing Hurt(Mar 2010) PP v Kamrul Hasan Abdul Quddus: Murder Conviction at Viz@Holland Construction Site(Jan 2010)
Ang Sin Teck & Co	2 cases	17% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Seng Inn Thye: Attempted Murder Sentencing for Stabbing Ex-Wife(Apr 2003) Loh Kok Siew v Public Prosecutor: Application for Postponement of Imprisonment Sentence(May 2002)
Raja Loo & Chandra	2 cases	17% of cases	PP v Ong Phee Hoon James: Harbouring Illegal Immigrants & Vicarious Liability(Jun 2000) Lee Yuen Hong v Public Prosecutor: Abetment, Criminal Breach of Trust, and Appellate Review of Factual Findings(Mar 2000)
Jing Quee & Chin Joo	2 cases	17% of cases	Ler Chun Poh v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Outrage of Modesty Conviction & Sentencing(Dec 2024) Tang Keng Lai v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Reference, Abuse of Process, and Costs Implications(May 2021)
Loo Ngan Chor & Co	1 cases	8% of cases	PP v Ng Ah Kang: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2001)
Belinda Ang Tang & Partners	1 cases	8% of cases	Tan Teck Koon v Tong Guat Hwa: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance(Mar 2016)
Rajah Loo & Chandra	1 cases	8% of cases	Suboh bin Ramli v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking in Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ang Sin Teck's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	102.1 parties avg	2.1	83%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ang Sin Teck's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	10(83%)	83%
Partial	1(8%)	8%
Won	1(8%)	8%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,000.00	666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ler Chun Poh v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Outrage of Modesty Conviction & Sentencing 02 Dec 2024 Ler Chun Poh (Lu Junbao) (Appellant)Lost	02 Dec 2024	Ler Chun Poh (Lu Junbao) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed; original sentence of eight months' imprisonment upheld.
2	Tang Keng Lai v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Reference, Abuse of Process, and Costs Implications 10 May 2021 Tang Keng Lai (Applicant)Lost	10 May 2021	Tang Keng Lai (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication dismissed; applicant ordered to pay $2,000 in costs to the Prosecution (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Tan Teck Koon v Tong Guat Hwa: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance 17 Mar 2016 Tan Teck Koon (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	17 Mar 2016	Tan Teck Koon (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedHusband's appeal against the division of matrimonial assets and maintenance was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	AAL v AAK: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Lump Sum Maintenance in Divorce 19 Jul 2012 AAL (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Jul 2012	AAL (Plaintiff): Division of matrimonial assetsReceived 40% of the matrimonial assets (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Lim Pang Howe Harry v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Intimidation and Causing Hurt 09 Mar 2010 Lim Pang Howe Harry (Appellant)Partial	09 Mar 2010	Lim Pang Howe Harry (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal against conviction for criminal intimidation and causing hurt was partially allowed. The sentence for criminal intimidation was reduced from four months to one month. The appeal against conviction and sentence for causing hurt was dismissed.
6	PP v Kamrul Hasan Abdul Quddus: Murder Conviction at Viz@Holland Construction Site 07 Jan 2010 Kamrul Hasan Abdul Quddus (Defendant)Lost	07 Jan 2010	Kamrul Hasan Abdul Quddus (Defendant): GuiltyThe accused is found guilty and convicted on the charge against him, and shall suffer the mandatory death sentence.
7	Public Prosecutor v Seng Inn Thye: Attempted Murder Sentencing for Stabbing Ex-Wife 13 Apr 2003 Seng Inn Thye (Accused)Lost	13 Apr 2003	Seng Inn Thye (Accused): Sentence of 5 years imprisonment and 4 strokes of the cane imposedThe accused was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and 4 strokes of the cane.
8	Loh Kok Siew v Public Prosecutor: Application for Postponement of Imprisonment Sentence 30 May 2002 Loh Kok Siew (Applicant)Lost	30 May 2002	Loh Kok Siew (Applicant): Criminal motion dismissedThe applicant's motion for an alteration of the order to commence serving his sentence on 3 June 2002 was dismissed.
9	PP v Ng Ah Kang: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 21 Oct 2001 Ng Ah Kang (Defendant)Lost	21 Oct 2001	Ng Ah Kang (Defendant): ConvictionAccused convicted and sentenced according to the law.
10	Suboh bin Ramli v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking in Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act 15 Nov 2000 Wong Kok Loong (Appellant)Lost	15 Nov 2000	Wong Kok Loong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedWong's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
11	PP v Ong Phee Hoon James: Harbouring Illegal Immigrants & Vicarious Liability 25 Jun 2000 Ong Phee Hoon James (Appellant)Lost	25 Jun 2000	Ong Phee Hoon James (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction for harbouring illegal immigrants was dismissed.
12	Lee Yuen Hong v Public Prosecutor: Abetment, Criminal Breach of Trust, and Appellate Review of Factual Findings 30 Mar 2000 Lee Yuen Hong (Appellant)Won	30 Mar 2000	Lee Yuen Hong (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against conviction allowed; sentence of ten weeks' imprisonment set aside.