Ang Siok Chen

Ang Siok Chen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated expertise across 42 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	10 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	7 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	6 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice21% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice8% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rape	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Functus Officio	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment by conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mutual Legal Assistance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Appeals	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonest Misappropriation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abduction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Misappropriation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Casinos and Gambling	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Income taxation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Siok Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ang Siok Chen has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	11 cases	92% of cases	Public Prosecutor v CEO: Abetment by Conspiracy to Commit Rape; Penal Code s 375(Apr 2024) Public Prosecutor v CEJ: Abetment to Rape, Sexual Assault, and Sentencing(Jun 2023) Teo Chu Ha v Public Prosecutor: Corruption & CDSA Offences in Seagate Tender Case(May 2023)
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 cases	8% of cases	Beluga Chartering GmbH v Beluga Projects: Cross-Border Insolvency, s377(3)(c) Companies Act(Feb 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ang Siok Chen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 2 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Partial	32.7 parties avg	2.7	25%
Won	83.4 parties avg	3.4	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2019	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ang Siok Chen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(8%)	8%
Partial	3(25%)	25%
Won	8(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	12,000.00	6,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v CEO: Abetment by Conspiracy to Commit Rape; Penal Code s 375 29 Apr 2024 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	29 Apr 2024	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of abetment by conspiracy to commit rape.
2	Public Prosecutor v CEJ: Abetment to Rape, Sexual Assault, and Sentencing 15 Jun 2023 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	15 Jun 2023	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 29 years' imprisonment and caning.
3	Teo Chu Ha v Public Prosecutor: Corruption & CDSA Offences in Seagate Tender Case 08 May 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant, Applicant)Partial	08 May 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant, Applicant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal against sentence partially allowed; sentences adjusted.
4	Public Prosecutor v CEP: Abetment by Conspiracy to Commit Rape Sentencing 12 Jan 2022 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	12 Jan 2022	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentence imposedThe accused was sentenced to 3 years' imprisonment.
5	PP v Tan Kok Ming: Corruption of Foreign Public Official & Sentencing Framework 05 Sep 2019 Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	05 Sep 2019	Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partProsecution's appeal against Kaur's sentences allowed.
6	Allswell Marketing Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor: Income Tax Act Penalties for Failure to File Tax Returns 27 Jun 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	27 Jun 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original decision.
7	Ho Man Yuk v Public Prosecutor: Dishonest Misappropriation of Property and Statutory Interpretation 06 Jan 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	06 Jan 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction AffirmedThe Court of Appeal answered the question in the negative and affirmed the convictions.
8	Shaikh Farid v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Misappropriation & CDSA Offences at Marina Bay Sands Casino 28 Sep 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	28 Sep 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
9	Karthigeyan M Kailasam v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence and Application of Section 301 of the Criminal Procedure Code 12 Sep 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	12 Sep 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal LostAppeal lost; appellant ordered to undergo 12 months MTO and fines paid to be refunded in full (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Tjong Mark Edward v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Corruption Sentence 05 Apr 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	05 Apr 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the acquittal on the second charge was successful. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
11	Tjong Mark Edward v Public Prosecutor: Corruption involving Agent and Reward for Appointment 23 Mar 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Won	23 Mar 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Cross-appeal on the second charge allowedThe High Court allowed the Public Prosecutor's cross-appeal on the second charge.
12	Beluga Chartering GmbH v Beluga Projects: Cross-Border Insolvency, s377(3)(c) Companies Act 25 Feb 2014 Beluga Chartering GmbH (in liquidation) (Appellant)Won	25 Feb 2014	Beluga Chartering GmbH (in liquidation) (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe court allowed the appeal and directed that the Singapore Liquidators of Beluga Chartering were at liberty to remit the company’s assets in Singapore to the German Liquidator subject to any deductions authorised or required under the Act, notwithstanding the existence of the Singapore Subsidiaries’ unsatisfied judgment debt.