Ang Wee Tiong

Ang Wee Tiong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 19 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and patent infringement. Their track record shows a 37.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 26% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated expertise across 82 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	17 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 17 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Property Law	5 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Patents	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Account of Profits	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Election of Remedies	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Choice of Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Annulment of bankruptcy order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside of bankruptcy order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Powers of the court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Family Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal representatives	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agreements for leases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Distributorship Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Delegation of Powers	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pre-action discovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fund Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patent Validity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dynamic Currency Conversion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Leases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interim Payment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patent Amendments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Innocent Infringement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lease Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Customer Confidentiality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forged document	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Enterprises	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letters of Credit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ang Wee Tiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ang Wee Tiong has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	9 cases	47% of cases	Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Election of Remedies for Patent Infringement(Oct 2009) Main-Line Corporate Holdings v United Overseas Bank: Patent Infringement & Interim Payments(Sep 2009) Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Patent Infringement & Discovery(Apr 2008)
TSMP Law Corporation	3 cases	16% of cases	UDL Marine v Jurong Town Corp: Interim Injunction & Proprietary Estoppel in Lease Renewal Dispute(Jun 2011) UDL Marine v Jurong Town Corp: Lease Renewal Refusal & Judicial Review(Feb 2011) UDL Marine v Jurong Town Corp: Proprietary Estoppel & Lease Renewal Dispute(Jan 2011)
Allen & Gledhill	2 cases	11% of cases	Abdul Razak Valibhoy v Keppel Investment Management Ltd: Breach of Contract and Fiduciary Duty in Investment Management(Oct 2002) MeesPierson NV v Bay Pacific: Letter of Credit Dispute over Forged Health Certificate(Aug 2000)
Lumiere Law LLP	2 cases	11% of cases	Sundar Venkatachalam v Bharathi: Annulment of Bankruptcy Order(Apr 2024) Tan Mei Sin v Tan Ah Lim: Administrator's Power of Attorney & Property Sale Dispute(Jul 2022)
Chris Chong & C T Ho Partnership	1 cases	5% of cases	Beijing Construction v EQ Insurance: Performance Bond Dispute(Sep 2015)
Chris Chong & CT Ho Partnership	1 cases	5% of cases	Quarella SpA v Scelta Marble: Setting Aside Arbitration Awards for Wrong Choice of Law(Aug 2012)
Tan Kok Quan Partnerhsip	1 cases	5% of cases	Yongnam Engineering v Yeo Wee Kiong: Negligence Claim over Springleaf Tower Mortgage Advice(Apr 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ang Wee Tiong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.9
Complex Cases: 5 (26%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	5%
Lost	99.0 parties avg	9.0	47%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	5%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	5%
Won	73.9 parties avg	3.9	37%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2005	212.2 parties avg	12.2
2006	35.2 parties avg	5.2
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ang Wee Tiong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(5%)	5%
Lost	9(47%)	47%
Neutral	1(5%)	5%
Partial	1(5%)	5%
Won	7(37%)	37%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,505,691.85	167,299.099 cases	9

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 19 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sundar Venkatachalam v Bharathi: Annulment of Bankruptcy Order 08 Apr 2024 Sundar Venkatachalam (Claimant)Neutral	08 Apr 2024	Sundar Venkatachalam (Claimant): Application dismissedThe claimant's claim was not dismissed, but the defendant's application to set aside the bankruptcy order was dismissed.
2	Tan Mei Sin v Tan Ah Lim: Administrator's Power of Attorney & Property Sale Dispute 28 Jul 2022 Tan Ah Lim (Defendant)Won	28 Jul 2022	Tan Ah Lim (Defendant): Successful DefenseDefendant successfully defended against the plaintiff's application.
3	Beijing Construction v EQ Insurance: Performance Bond Dispute 30 Sep 2015 BEIJING CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING GROUP CO LTD (SINGAPORE BRANCH) (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	30 Sep 2015	BEIJING CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING GROUP CO LTD (SINGAPORE BRANCH) (Plaintiff, Respondent): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff for $1,000,000 under the performance bond (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Quarella SpA v Scelta Marble: Setting Aside Arbitration Awards for Wrong Choice of Law 13 Aug 2012 Quarella SpA (Plaintiff)Lost	13 Aug 2012	Quarella SpA (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the arbitration awards was dismissed.
5	UDL Marine v Jurong Town Corp: Interim Injunction & Proprietary Estoppel in Lease Renewal Dispute 16 Jun 2011 UDL Marine (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	16 Jun 2011	UDL Marine (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Application dismissedUDL Marine's application for an interim injunction was dismissed.
6	UDL Marine v Jurong Town Corp: Lease Renewal Refusal & Judicial Review 27 Feb 2011 UDL Marine (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	27 Feb 2011	UDL Marine (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for leave to apply for a quashing order and a mandatory order was dismissed. Costs awarded to JTC and the AG fixed at $3,500 each excluding disbursements which were to be paid by the plaintiff on a reimbursement basis. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	UDL Marine v Jurong Town Corp: Proprietary Estoppel & Lease Renewal Dispute 02 Jan 2011 UDL Marine (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	02 Jan 2011	UDL Marine (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application to amend Statement of Claim AllowedPlaintiff’s application in Summons 5856 of 2010 to amend its Statement of Claim is allowed.
8	Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Election of Remedies for Patent Infringement 15 Oct 2009 United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	15 Oct 2009	United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the decision to allow Main-Line to elect an account of profits was dismissed.
9	Main-Line Corporate Holdings v United Overseas Bank: Patent Infringement & Interim Payments 22 Sep 2009 United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	22 Sep 2009	United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedDefendant's appeal against the order for interim payment was allowed.
10	Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Patent Infringement & Discovery 09 Apr 2008 United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant)Dismissed	09 Apr 2008	United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedApplication for further discovery against the first defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	First Currency Choice v Main-Line: Dynamic Currency Conversion Patent Dispute 30 Oct 2007 United Overseas Bank Limited (Appellant)Lost	30 Oct 2007	United Overseas Bank Limited (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Patent Infringement & Dynamic Currency Conversion 20 Dec 2006 United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant)Lost	20 Dec 2006	United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe defendant's counterclaim for invalidating the patent was dismissed.
13	Yongnam Engineering v Yeo Wee Kiong: Negligence Claim over Springleaf Tower Mortgage Advice 10 Apr 2006 Yeo Wee Kiong (Defendant)Won	10 Apr 2006	Yeo Wee Kiong (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Sheares v Chow: Family Arrangement, Trust Constitution & Testamentary Disposition 27 Feb 2006 Sheares Betty Hang Kiu (Plaintiff)Won	27 Feb 2006	Sheares Betty Hang Kiu (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court found the DFA and DOT valid and enforceable, and ordered the defendants to provide an account of the trust assets. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	SM Integrated Transware v Schenker Singapore: Lease Agreement Dispute 29 Mar 2005 SM Integrated Transware Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	29 Mar 2005	SM Integrated Transware Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $505,691.85, plus costs and interest. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Harrisson v Jones: Tanglin Club Voting Dispute over Capital Expenditure 06 Mar 2005 Khew Edwin (Defendant)Lost	06 Mar 2005	Khew Edwin (Defendant): Judgment against the defendantJudgment against the defendant; Resolutions 1A and 1B are invalid and of no effect.
17	Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries: Pre-Action Discovery & Fraud 27 Jul 2004 Sumitomo Mutsui Banking Corporation (Applicant)Lost	27 Jul 2004	Sumitomo Mutsui Banking Corporation (Applicant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the order for pre-action discovery was allowed, resulting in the dismissal of the application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Abdul Razak Valibhoy v Keppel Investment Management Ltd: Breach of Contract and Fiduciary Duty in Investment Management 10 Oct 2002 Keppel Investment Management Ltd (Defendant)Won	10 Oct 2002	Keppel Investment Management Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; Plaintiff's action is dismissed with costs.
19	MeesPierson NV v Bay Pacific: Letter of Credit Dispute over Forged Health Certificate 13 Aug 2000 MeesPierson NV (Plaintiff)Lost	13 Aug 2000	MeesPierson NV (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for misrepresentation and restitution was dismissed.