Angeline Soh Ean Leng

Angeline Soh Ean Leng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in limitation and guarantees and indemnities. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and guarantee.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sham Transaction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of duty of confidentiality	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Privity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Angeline Soh Ean Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Angeline Soh Ean Leng has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Legis Point LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	Goodwood Associates v. Southernpec: Sham Contracts, Conspiracy & Fuel Oil Trading(Nov 2020) RBS Coutts Bank v Kothari: Summary Judgment & Conclusive Evidence Clauses in Forex Trading Dispute(Dec 2009) PT Jaya v Kristle: Guarantee, Indemnity & Limitation Act Dispute(May 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Angeline Soh Ean Leng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	15.0 parties avg	5.0	25%
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	24.3 parties avg	4.3	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2009	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Angeline Soh Ean Leng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(25%)	25%
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	4,069,109.00	2,034,554.502 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Goodwood Associates v. Southernpec: Sham Contracts, Conspiracy & Fuel Oil Trading 04 Nov 2020 Andrew Lim Boon Leong (Defendant in Counterclaim)Dismissed	04 Nov 2020	Andrew Lim Boon Leong (Defendant in Counterclaim): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim for conspiracy dismissed.
2	RBS Coutts Bank v Kothari: Summary Judgment & Conclusive Evidence Clauses in Forex Trading Dispute 02 Dec 2009 Shishir Tarachand Kothari (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	02 Dec 2009	Shishir Tarachand Kothari (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Defendant owes Plaintiff USD 569,109.
3	PT Jaya v Kristle: Guarantee, Indemnity & Limitation Act Dispute 27 May 2009 Kristle Trading Ltd (Respondent, Appellant)Won	27 May 2009	Kristle Trading Ltd (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	International Coal v Kristle Trading: Arbitration Confidentiality & Issue Estoppel 21 Oct 2008 Kristle Trading Ltd (Defendant)Won	21 Oct 2008	Kristle Trading Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant on CounterclaimJudgment awarded to the defendant on its counterclaim in the amount of $3,500,000 (assumed USD, as the underlying agreement was in USD).