Anil Balchandani

Anil Balchandani is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and striking out. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Anil Balchandani has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Anil Balchandani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anil Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anil Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anil Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anil Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anil Balchandani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anil Balchandani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Anil Balchandani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Anil Balchandani has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
I.R.B Law LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Tommy Choo v Kuntjoro Wibawa: Striking Out Application for Lack of Jurisdiction(Jun 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Anil Balchandani's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Anil Balchandani's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tommy Choo v Kuntjoro Wibawa: Striking Out Application for Lack of Jurisdiction 11 Jun 2017 Tommy Choo Mark Go & Partners (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	11 Jun 2017	Tommy Choo Mark Go & Partners (Plaintiff, Respondent): Application dismissedThe Defendant's application to strike out the Originating Summons was dismissed.