Anne-Marie John

Anne-Marie John is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in injunctions and contributory negligence. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Anne-Marie John has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trusts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Express trusts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anne-Marie John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Anne-Marie John has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Legis Point LLC	4 cases	80% of cases	Chainani v Singh: Striking Out Amendment Resiling from Admission(May 2023) Ambihathevi v Jeevarajah: Interlocutory Injunction for Property Transfer & Exclusion(Jun 2021) Ho Yew Kong v ERC Holdings: Trust, Disclaimer, Quistclose Trust & Constructive Trust(Nov 2018)
Clifford Law LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	Pollmann v Ye: Negligence & Contributory Negligence in Cycling Accident(Oct 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Anne-Marie John's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Anne-Marie John's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,500.00	1,833.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chainani v Singh: Striking Out Amendment Resiling from Admission 29 May 2023 Tarun Hotchand Chainani (Plaintiff)Won	29 May 2023	Tarun Hotchand Chainani (Plaintiff): Application allowedPlaintiff's application to strike out the Impugned Sentence allowed; costs of and incidental to the application fixed at $5,500, inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Ambihathevi v Jeevarajah: Interlocutory Injunction for Property Transfer & Exclusion 27 Jun 2021 Jeevarajah Nithiananthan (Defendant)Lost	27 Jun 2021	Jeevarajah Nithiananthan (Defendant): Injunction granted against defendantInterlocutory injunction granted against the defendant, excluding him from the property. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ho Yew Kong v ERC Holdings: Trust, Disclaimer, Quistclose Trust & Constructive Trust 26 Nov 2018 Ho Yew Kong (Plaintiff)Neutral	26 Nov 2018	Ho Yew Kong (Plaintiff): NeutralFiled interpleader action; no direct win or loss.
4	Legis Point LLC v Tay Choon Ai: Dispute over Legal Fee Agreement and Interpretation of 'Hard Cap' Clause 27 Dec 2017 Legis Point LLC (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Dec 2017	Legis Point LLC (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe Plaintiff's application was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Pollmann v Ye: Negligence & Contributory Negligence in Cycling Accident 01 Oct 2017 POLLMANN, CHRISTIAN JOACHIM (Plaintiff)Won	01 Oct 2017	POLLMANN, CHRISTIAN JOACHIM (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages shall be assessed separately (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).