Anneson Neo

Anneson Neo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal malpractice and professional negligence. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Anneson Neo has demonstrated expertise across 7 primary practice areas, with significant experience in legal malpractice and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anneson Neo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anneson Neo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anneson Neo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anneson Neo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anneson Neo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anneson Neo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anneson Neo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Anneson Neo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
A. Ang, Seah & Hoe	1 cases	100% of cases	Gomez v Bird & Bird: Professional Negligence Claim for Failure to Recover Debt(Oct 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Anneson Neo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Anneson Neo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Gomez v Bird & Bird: Professional Negligence Claim for Failure to Recover Debt 11 Oct 2021 Bird & Bird ATMD LLP (Defendant)Won	11 Oct 2021	Bird & Bird ATMD LLP (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff was ordered to pay the defendant's costs on the standard basis up to the service of the offer to settle and thereafter on an indemnity basis (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).