Anthony Wee Soon Kim

Anthony Wee Soon Kim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in ad hoc admission and mckenzie friend. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Anthony Wee Soon Kim has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anthony Wee Soon Kim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Anthony Wee Soon Kim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Anthony Wee Soon Kim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Anthony Wee Soon Kim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anthony Wee Soon Kim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anthony Wee Soon Kim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anthony Wee Soon Kim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anthony Wee Soon Kim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
McKenzie Friend	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anthony Wee Soon Kim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anthony Wee Soon Kim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anthony Wee Soon Kim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anthony Wee Soon Kim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Anthony Wee Soon Kim has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Independent Practitioner	3 cases	100% of cases	Godfrey Gerald QC v UBS AG: Ad Hoc Admission & Legal Representation in Banking Dispute(Apr 2003) Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Right to Legal Representation for Litigants in Person(Sep 2002) Anthony Wee v UBS AG: Discovery, Banking Act, and Evidence Act in Foreign Exchange Transactions(Sep 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Anthony Wee Soon Kim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2003	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Anthony Wee Soon Kim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Godfrey Gerald QC v UBS AG: Ad Hoc Admission & Legal Representation in Banking Dispute 14 Apr 2003 Godfrey Gerald, Queen's Counsel (Appellant)Lost	14 Apr 2003	Godfrey Gerald, Queen's Counsel (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to all three respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Right to Legal Representation for Litigants in Person 15 Sep 2002 Wee Soon Kim Anthony (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	15 Sep 2002	Wee Soon Kim Anthony (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the order preventing Mr. Goh from presenting arguments on the plaintiff's behalf was dismissed.
3	Anthony Wee v UBS AG: Discovery, Banking Act, and Evidence Act in Foreign Exchange Transactions 06 Sep 2002 Anthony Wee Soon Kim (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	06 Sep 2002	Anthony Wee Soon Kim (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedPlaintiff's appeal against the order granting the defendant's application for orders under section 175 of the Evidence Act was dismissed.