Anuradha Tiwary

Anuradha Tiwary is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and torts. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Anuradha Tiwary has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anuradha Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anuradha Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anuradha Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anuradha Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anuradha Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anuradha Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anuradha Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anuradha Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anuradha Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anuradha Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
False Imprisonment	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anuradha Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Anuradha Tiwary has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Bajwa & Co	1 cases	50% of cases	Amutha Valli v Redemptorist Fathers: Tort Claims for Assault, False Imprisonment & Negligence in Alleged Exorcism(Feb 2009)
Pillai and Pillai	1 cases	50% of cases	SBS Transit v Teo Chye Seng Douglas: Costs Award Dispute in Negligence Claim(Jan 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Anuradha Tiwary's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	110.0 parties avg	10.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	110.0 parties avg	10.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Anuradha Tiwary's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Amutha Valli v Redemptorist Fathers: Tort Claims for Assault, False Imprisonment & Negligence in Alleged Exorcism 12 Feb 2009 Amutha Valli d/o Krishnan (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Feb 2009	Amutha Valli d/o Krishnan (Plaintiff): Claim dismissedThe plaintiff's claims for assault and battery, false imprisonment, and negligence were dismissed.
2	SBS Transit v Teo Chye Seng Douglas: Costs Award Dispute in Negligence Claim 25 Jan 2005 Teo Chye Seng Douglas (Respondent)Partial	25 Jan 2005	Teo Chye Seng Douglas (Respondent): Costs order variedCosts order below varied. Each party to bear his/its own costs in respect of Teo’s claims. Teo to pay the costs of the applications for leave to appeal and the substantive appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.