Anusha Prabhakaran

Anusha Prabhakaran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and divorce. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Anusha Prabhakaran has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and divorce.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Anusha Prabhakaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Anusha Prabhakaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anusha Prabhakaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Relocation Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Anusha Prabhakaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anusha Prabhakaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anusha Prabhakaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anusha Prabhakaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anusha Prabhakaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anusha Prabhakaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anusha Prabhakaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anusha Prabhakaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anusha Prabhakaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anusha Prabhakaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anusha Prabhakaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Relocation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anusha Prabhakaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Parent-Child Relationship	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anusha Prabhakaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anusha Prabhakaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anusha Prabhakaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Anusha Prabhakaran has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	BNS v BNT: Child Relocation, Welfare of Child, and Parental Relationships(Apr 2015) BNT v BNS: Relocation of Children to Canada Dispute(Sep 2014) BMP v BMQ: Contempt of Court for Breach of Mareva Injunction(Dec 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Anusha Prabhakaran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Anusha Prabhakaran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,000.00	2,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	BNS v BNT: Child Relocation, Welfare of Child, and Parental Relationships 19 Apr 2015 BNT (Respondent)Won	19 Apr 2015	BNT (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with no order as to costs.
2	BNT v BNS: Relocation of Children to Canada Dispute 23 Sep 2014 BNT (Appellant, Father)Won	23 Sep 2014	BNT (Appellant, Father): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; mother to pay costs of the appeal and relocation application fixed at $5,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	BMP v BMQ: Contempt of Court for Breach of Mareva Injunction 04 Dec 2013 BMQ (Defendant, Appellant)Won	04 Dec 2013	BMQ (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedDefendant's appeal against the District Judge's decision was allowed.