Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh

Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated expertise across 33 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Voluntary Arrangement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Securities Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Nominee's duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debtor's duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
UniLegal LLC	3 cases	50% of cases	Sports Connection v Deuter Sports: Exclusive Distributorship Termination Dispute(Jul 2008) Panwah Steel v Koh Brothers: Project-Specific Contract Dispute Over Steel Rebars for Changi Water Reclamation Plant(Sep 2006) Panwah Steel v Burwill Trading: Breach of Contract, Damages, and Sale of Goods(Sep 2006)
Pinnacle Law LLC	3 cases	50% of cases	MS First Capital Insurance v Smart Automobile: Breach of Contract & Contractual Terms Dispute(Nov 2020) The Enterprise Fund II Ltd v Jong Hee Sen: Breach of Contract & Mitigation of Damages(Mar 2019) Aathar Ah Kong Andrew v CIMB Securities: Review of Voluntary Arrangement Approval(Apr 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	35.0 parties avg	5.0	50%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Aqbal Singh a/l Kuldip Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Partial	2(33%)	33%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	38,356.84	7,671.375 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	MS First Capital Insurance v Smart Automobile: Breach of Contract & Contractual Terms Dispute 19 Nov 2020 Smart Automobile Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Lost	19 Nov 2020	Smart Automobile Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Counterclaim DismissedThe defendant's counterclaim for the return of S$500,000 was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	The Enterprise Fund II Ltd v Jong Hee Sen: Breach of Contract & Mitigation of Damages 28 Mar 2019 Jong Hee Sen (Defendant)Lost	28 Mar 2019	Jong Hee Sen (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim in conversion is dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Aathar Ah Kong Andrew v CIMB Securities: Review of Voluntary Arrangement Approval 02 Apr 2017 Aathar Ah Kong Andrew (Applicant)Lost	02 Apr 2017	Aathar Ah Kong Andrew (Applicant): Application dismissedApproval of the voluntary arrangement revoked; ordered to pay costs of $8,000 plus reasonable disbursements to each set of applicant creditors (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Sports Connection v Deuter Sports: Exclusive Distributorship Termination Dispute 09 Jul 2008 Deuter Sports GmbH (Defendant)Partial	09 Jul 2008	Deuter Sports GmbH (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedInterlocutory judgment granted to the defendant on the counterclaim with damages to be assessed by the Registrar.
5	Panwah Steel v Koh Brothers: Project-Specific Contract Dispute Over Steel Rebars for Changi Water Reclamation Plant 17 Sep 2006 Panwah Steel Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	17 Sep 2006	Panwah Steel Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Panwah Steel not liable for the shortfall in rebars. No monetary amount specified.
6	Panwah Steel v Burwill Trading: Breach of Contract, Damages, and Sale of Goods 17 Sep 2006 Panwah Steel Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	17 Sep 2006	Panwah Steel Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in part, appeal allowed in partAppeal dismissed with respect to the Changi Agreement. Appeal allowed with respect to the quantum of damages awardable in so far as the Burmese Agreements are concerned. Damages of $38,356.84 awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).