Archana Patel

Archana Patel is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and divorce. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Archana Patel has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Archana Patel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Archana Patel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Archana Patel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Archana Patel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Archana Patel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Archana Patel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Archana Patel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Archana Patel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Archana Patel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Archana Patel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Archana Patel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Archana Patel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Archana Patel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Archana Patel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Archana Patel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Archana Patel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Veil	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Archana Patel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Archana Patel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Archana Patel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Archana Patel has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Rajah & Cheah	3 cases	100% of cases	AQB v AQC: Appeal on Conditions for Final Divorce Judgment under Women's Charter(Apr 2011) Gispen v Ling: Piercing the Corporate Veil & Misrepresentation in Timber Concession Sale(Nov 2001) Chau Kwok Fun Kevin v Etons Management: Rectification of Settlement Agreement(Mar 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Archana Patel's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.8
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33%
Won	28.5 parties avg	8.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	115.0 parties avg	15.0
2001	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Archana Patel's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	AQB v AQC: Appeal on Conditions for Final Divorce Judgment under Women's Charter 26 Apr 2011 AQC (Respondent, Defendant)Won	26 Apr 2011	AQC (Respondent, Defendant): Leave to make interim judgment final upheldThe husband's application for leave to make the interim judgment final was upheld. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Gispen v Ling: Piercing the Corporate Veil & Misrepresentation in Timber Concession Sale 21 Nov 2001 Gerhard Hendrik Gispen (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Nov 2001	Gerhard Hendrik Gispen (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; no monetary award. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Chau Kwok Fun Kevin v Etons Management: Rectification of Settlement Agreement 06 Mar 2000 German Automobiles Pte Ltd formerly known as German Motors Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	06 Mar 2000	German Automobiles Pte Ltd formerly known as German Motors Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application for Rectification AllowedThe application of the 4th to 13th Defendants to rectify the agreement was allowed.