Arlene Foo

Arlene Foo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal malpractice and conveyancing. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Arlene Foo has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and legal malpractice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Arlene Foo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Arlene Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Arlene Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Arlene Foo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Arlene Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Arlene Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arlene Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Arlene Foo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Arlene Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Arlene Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Arlene Foo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Arlene Foo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Arlene Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Arlene Foo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arlene Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Arlene Foo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Advocatus Law LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Sports Connection v Asia Law Corp: Professional Negligence, Trademark, Damages Assessment(Aug 2015) Su Ah Tee v Allister Lim: Breach of Contract & Negligence in Property Purchase(Aug 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Arlene Foo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	18.0 parties avg	8.0	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Arlene Foo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	635,376.00	317,688.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sports Connection v Asia Law Corp: Professional Negligence, Trademark, Damages Assessment 13 Aug 2015 Asia Law Corporation (Defendant)Won	13 Aug 2015	Asia Law Corporation (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Su Ah Tee v Allister Lim: Breach of Contract & Negligence in Property Purchase 10 Aug 2014 M/S ALLISTER LIM AND THRUMURGAN (Defendant)Lost	10 Aug 2014	M/S ALLISTER LIM AND THRUMURGAN (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages to be paid in the amount of $317,688 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).