Arthur Edwin Lim

Arthur Edwin Lim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and criminal law. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Arthur Edwin Lim has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and asset recovery.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Arthur Edwin Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Arthur Edwin Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Arthur Edwin Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Arthur Edwin Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Arthur Edwin Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arthur Edwin Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Arthur Edwin Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Arthur Edwin Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Arthur Edwin Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Arthur Edwin Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Arthur Edwin Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Arthur Edwin Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Arthur Edwin Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Arthur Edwin Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Pre-action discovery	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arthur Edwin Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Single economic entity	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Arthur Edwin Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Arthur Edwin Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Electronic Transactions Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arthur Edwin Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Arthur Edwin Lim has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Jeyabalen & Partners	2 cases	67% of cases	Manuchar Steel v Star Pacific: Pre-Action Discovery & Single Economic Entity(Sep 2014) ABE v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Outraging Modesty and Rape(Jan 2014)
Kurup & Boo	1 cases	33% of cases	Joseph Mathew v Singh Chiranjeev: Enforceability of Electronic Contracts for Land Sale(Oct 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Arthur Edwin Lim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	24.7 parties avg	4.7	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Arthur Edwin Lim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	34,020.10	17,010.052 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Manuchar Steel v Star Pacific: Pre-Action Discovery & Single Economic Entity 22 Sep 2014 Star Pacific Line Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	22 Sep 2014	Star Pacific Line Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for pre-action discovery was dismissed; costs of $3,000 awarded to Star Pacific (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	ABE v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Outraging Modesty and Rape 26 Jan 2014 ABE (Appellant)Lost	26 Jan 2014	ABE (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
3	Joseph Mathew v Singh Chiranjeev: Enforceability of Electronic Contracts for Land Sale 28 Oct 2009 Singh Chiranjeev (Respondent)Won	28 Oct 2009	Singh Chiranjeev (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the respondent; damages awarded in the amount of $15,510.05 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).