Arthur Poh

Arthur Poh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2002. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Arthur Poh has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in bankruptcy and corporate law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Bankruptcy	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Arthur Poh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arthur Poh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Arthur Poh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Arthur Poh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Arthur Poh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Arthur Poh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Arthur Poh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Arthur Poh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Arthur Poh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Arthur Poh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Family Companies	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Arthur Poh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Arthur Poh has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Khattar Wong and Partners	1 cases	100% of cases	Tong Djoe v Hua Ann Brothers: Right to Occupy Property Dispute(Oct 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Arthur Poh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Arthur Poh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tong Djoe v Hua Ann Brothers: Right to Occupy Property Dispute 17 Oct 2002 Hua Ann Brothers Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	17 Oct 2002	Hua Ann Brothers Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe defendant successfully defended against the plaintiff's claim.