Arthur Quay

Arthur Quay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal property ownership and beneficial ownership. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Arthur Quay has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	15% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Arthur Quay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Arthur Quay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Personal Property Ownership	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Arthur Quay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arthur Quay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Arthur Quay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Arthur Quay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Arthur Quay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Arthur Quay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Warranty	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Arthur Quay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Subscription and Option Agreement	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Arthur Quay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Arthur Quay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Earnest Money	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Arthur Quay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Arthur Quay has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dominion LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Van Der Horst Engineering v Rotol: Breach of Contract & Warranty in Share Subscription Agreement(Mar 2006)
Wong M Seow and JYP Chia	1 cases	50% of cases	Wong Kia Meng v Seet Siow Luan: Beneficial Ownership of Smart Tuition Centre Dispute(May 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Arthur Quay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	23.8 parties avg	3.8	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Arthur Quay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	314,944.00	157,472.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Van Der Horst Engineering v Rotol: Breach of Contract & Warranty in Share Subscription Agreement 23 Mar 2006 Van Der Horst Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	23 Mar 2006	Van Der Horst Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; Rotol was ordered to refund VDH the $100,000 earnest money and pay $150,000 in special damages (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Wong Kia Meng v Seet Siow Luan: Beneficial Ownership of Smart Tuition Centre Dispute 27 May 2004 Seet Siow Luan (Defendant)Won	27 May 2004	Seet Siow Luan (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedThe court declared that the first defendant is the beneficial owner of Smart and the plaintiff is to return $64,944.00 taken by him from Smart’s bank account to the first defendant without interest thereon. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.