Arul Chandran

Arul Chandran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and production of documents. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Arul Chandran has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and estate administration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Production of documents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Discharge of Counsel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Tracing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Release	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Subpoena	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interests	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arul Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Arul Chandran has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
C Arul & Partners	3 cases	60% of cases	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Appeal Against Subpoena in Estate Assets Inquiry(Oct 2002) Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Interim Payments, Mareva Injunctions & Third Party Proceedings in Estate Inquiry(Sep 2002) Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Application for Discharge of Counsel due to Conflict of Interest(Apr 2002)
C Arul and Partners	2 cases	40% of cases	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Application to Expunge Documents from Record of Appeal(Aug 2004) Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Appeal over Estate Valuation and Distribution(Jun 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Arul Chandran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.5 parties avg	4.5	40%
Neutral	24.0 parties avg	4.0	40%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2004	25.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Arul Chandran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Neutral	2(40%)	40%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Application to Expunge Documents from Record of Appeal 26 Aug 2004 Sjamsudin Husni also known as Ong Siauw-Tjoan (Respondent, Defendant)Neutral	26 Aug 2004	Sjamsudin Husni also known as Ong Siauw-Tjoan (Respondent, Defendant): NeutralSecond respondent did not participate in the application.
2	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Appeal over Estate Valuation and Distribution 15 Jun 2004 Husni Sjamsudin also known as Ong Siauw-Tjoan (Defendant)Lost	15 Jun 2004	Husni Sjamsudin also known as Ong Siauw-Tjoan (Defendant): Appeal dismissedSecond defendant’s appeal was concerned almost entirely with findings of fact and was dismissed.
3	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Appeal Against Subpoena in Estate Assets Inquiry 28 Oct 2002 Ong Jane Rebecca (Respondent)Won	28 Oct 2002	Ong Jane Rebecca (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the respondent.
4	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Interim Payments, Mareva Injunctions & Third Party Proceedings in Estate Inquiry 26 Sep 2002 Second defendant (Defendant)Lost	26 Sep 2002	Second defendant (Defendant): Application for interim payment disallowedSecond defendant's application as a beneficiary was disallowed.
5	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Application for Discharge of Counsel due to Conflict of Interest 22 Apr 2002 Ong Siauw Tjoan (Defendant)Neutral	22 Apr 2002	Ong Siauw Tjoan (Defendant): NeutralThe outcome for the second defendant is neutral in this application for discharge of counsel.