Arvindran Manoosegaran

Arvindran Manoosegaran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and corporate notes. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Agreements	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Secured Convertible Note	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Share Pledge Agreement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Debenture	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Notes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Arvindran Manoosegaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Arvindran Manoosegaran has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Remedies for Failure to Issue SAP Notes(Aug 2010) Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Breach of Contract over Refusal to Issue Corporate Notes(Apr 2010) Rockline Ltd v Anil Thadani: Expungement of Evidence and Privilege in Breach of Contract and Conspiracy Suit(Sep 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Arvindran Manoosegaran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.5
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33%
Won	210.7 parties avg	10.7	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	113.0 parties avg	13.0
2010	26.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Arvindran Manoosegaran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	200.00	200.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Remedies for Failure to Issue SAP Notes 25 Aug 2010 Rockline Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	25 Aug 2010	Rockline Ltd (Plaintiff): Nominal damages awardedNominal damages of $100 awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Breach of Contract over Refusal to Issue Corporate Notes 25 Apr 2010 Rockline Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	25 Apr 2010	Rockline Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court will hear parties as to the appropriate remedies and relief before making any order herein. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Rockline Ltd v Anil Thadani: Expungement of Evidence and Privilege in Breach of Contract and Conspiracy Suit 16 Sep 2009 Rockline Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	16 Sep 2009	Rockline Ltd (Plaintiff): Application to expunge documents grantedPlaintiff's application to expunge various documents she claimed to be privileged communication was granted.