Asanthi Mendis

Asanthi Mendis is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal profession act and judicial review. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Asanthi Mendis has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in legal profession act and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Asanthi Mendis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Asanthi Mendis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Asanthi Mendis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Asanthi Mendis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Tribunal	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Asanthi Mendis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Asanthi Mendis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Asanthi Mendis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Asanthi Mendis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Asanthi Mendis has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	100% of cases	Manjit Singh v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal Appointment(Mar 2013) Manjit Singh v Attorney-General: Application for Quashing Order Against Chief Justice's Order(Jun 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Asanthi Mendis's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Asanthi Mendis's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Manjit Singh v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal Appointment 13 Mar 2013 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	13 Mar 2013	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Appellants ordered to pay half the costs of the appeal to the Respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Manjit Singh v Attorney-General: Application for Quashing Order Against Chief Justice's Order 28 Jun 2012 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	28 Jun 2012	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application for leave to apply for judicial review was dismissed.