Ashok Kumar

Ashok Kumar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 22 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in costs and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 59.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 32% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ashok Kumar has demonstrated expertise across 66 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	13 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 13 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	9 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	9 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	9 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Costs	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Presumptions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Presumption of fact in loans of money	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loans of money	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debentures	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Scheme of Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair Preference	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy Discharge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Libel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unconsumed Leave	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Aviation Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ashok Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ashok Kumar has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 10 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill	10 cases	45% of cases	Jeyaretnam v Krishnan: Bankruptcy Discharge Application & Garnishment Validity(May 2007) Re Jeyaretnam: Appeal Dismissed on Bankruptcy Discharge Application \| Singapore Insolvency Law(Jan 2007) Tapematic SpA v Wirana Pte Ltd: Agency Law & Misrepresentation in Letter of Credit Transaction(Jan 2002)
Allen and Gledhill	5 cases	23% of cases	Re Bintan Lagoon Resort Ltd: Judicial Management Order Application(Aug 2005) Ong Cheng Aik v Dayco Products: Extension of Time to File Record of Appeal(Mar 2005) Jeyaretnam v Krishnan: Appeal Dismissed in Bankruptcy Discharge Case(Nov 2004)
BlackOak LLC	3 cases	14% of cases	Bhavin Rashmi Mehta v Chetan Mehta: Director Resignation & Company Law(Jul 2022) Power Solar System Co Ltd v Suntech Power Investment Pte Ltd: Loan Recovery & Share Consideration Dispute(Oct 2018) Re Gulf Pacific Shipping Ltd: Recognition of Foreign Liquidators in Cross-Border Insolvency(Dec 2016)
Stamford Law Corporation	3 cases	14% of cases	Jurong Data Centre v M+W Singapore: Validity of Security Documents & Charges(Mar 2011) Tam Chee Chong v DBS Bank: Unfair Preference in Judicial Management(Nov 2010) Raiffeisen Zentralbank v Continental Chemical: Adjournment of Winding Up Proceedings for Scheme of Arrangement(Mar 2010)
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 cases	5% of cases	Oriental Insurance v Reliance National Asia Re: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor's Proof of Debt(Nov 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ashok Kumar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 7 (32%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.6 parties avg	2.6	23%
Neutral	113.0 parties avg	13.0	5%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	9%
Unknown	16.0 parties avg	6.0	5%
Won	134.3 parties avg	4.3	59%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	38.3 parties avg	8.3
2001	42.6 parties avg	2.6
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2005	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2007	38.0 parties avg	8.0
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ashok Kumar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(23%)	23%
Neutral	1(5%)	5%
Partial	2(9%)	9%
Unknown	1(5%)	5%
Won	13(59%)	59%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	563,000.00	40,214.2914 cases	14
USD	198,100,480.37	99,050,240.192 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2001	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Unknown: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 22 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Bhavin Rashmi Mehta v Chetan Mehta: Director Resignation & Company Law 27 Jul 2022 Chetan Mehta (Defendant)Won	27 Jul 2022	Chetan Mehta (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; costs awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Power Solar System Co Ltd v Suntech Power Investment Pte Ltd: Loan Recovery & Share Consideration Dispute 24 Oct 2018 Power Solar System Co Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	24 Oct 2018	Power Solar System Co Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of US$197,501,785 with interest.
3	Re Gulf Pacific Shipping Ltd: Recognition of Foreign Liquidators in Cross-Border Insolvency 29 Dec 2016 Wong Teck Meng (Applicant)Won	29 Dec 2016	Wong Teck Meng (Applicant): Application grantedApplication by liquidator for recognition and information access granted.
4	Jurong Data Centre v M+W Singapore: Validity of Security Documents & Charges 15 Mar 2011 Jurong Data Centre Development Pte Ltd (provisional liquidator appointed) (receivers and managers appointed) (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Mar 2011	Jurong Data Centre Development Pte Ltd (provisional liquidator appointed) (receivers and managers appointed) (Plaintiff): Action DismissedJDD’s action against all the defendants fails and must be dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Tam Chee Chong v DBS Bank: Unfair Preference in Judicial Management 17 Nov 2010 DBS Bank Ltd (Defendant)Lost	17 Nov 2010	DBS Bank Ltd (Defendant): Judgment Against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; the defendant shall pay JHTI the total net sale proceeds received from the disposal of the MAP Shares (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Raiffeisen Zentralbank v Continental Chemical: Adjournment of Winding Up Proceedings for Scheme of Arrangement 07 Mar 2010 Continental Chemical Corp Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	07 Mar 2010	Continental Chemical Corp Pte Ltd (Respondent): Adjournment GrantedThe court granted the company's application for a five-month adjournment of the winding up proceedings.
7	Oriental Insurance v Reliance National Asia Re: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor's Proof of Debt 29 Nov 2007 Reliance National Asia Re Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2007	Reliance National Asia Re Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application for a three-week extension of time to file its Proof of Debt under the Scheme was dismissed with costs.
8	Jeyaretnam v Krishnan: Bankruptcy Discharge Application & Garnishment Validity 31 May 2007 S Jayakumar (Respondent)Neutral	31 May 2007	S Jayakumar (Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part, with a conditional discharge granted to the appellant.
9	Re Jeyaretnam: Appeal Dismissed on Bankruptcy Discharge Application \| Singapore Insolvency Law 25 Jan 2007 Indra Krishnan (Respondent, Creditor)Won	25 Jan 2007	Indra Krishnan (Respondent, Creditor): Objection UpheldObjection to the discharge application was upheld (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Re Bintan Lagoon Resort Ltd: Judicial Management Order Application 18 Aug 2005 Secured creditor (Respondent)	18 Aug 2005	Secured creditor (Respondent): -
11	Ong Cheng Aik v Dayco Products: Extension of Time to File Record of Appeal 15 Mar 2005 Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent, Plaintiff)Partial	15 Mar 2005	Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent, Plaintiff): Costs awardedCosts of $3,000 awarded against the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Jeyaretnam v Krishnan: Appeal Dismissed in Bankruptcy Discharge Case 24 Nov 2004 First and Eleventh Creditors (Other)Won	24 Nov 2004	First and Eleventh Creditors (Other): Creditor's Objection UpheldThe court's decision to refuse discharge from bankruptcy was in line with the creditors' objections.
13	Dayco Products v Ong: Director's Fiduciary Duty & Disclosure of Interest 01 Sep 2004 Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	01 Sep 2004	Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Judgment for the PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the total sum of US$598,695.37 together with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the Writ of Summons until judgment.
14	Jeyaretnam Joshua Benjamin v Indra Krishnan: Appeal Against Dismissal of Bankruptcy Discharge Application 23 May 2004 Indra Krishnan (Respondent)Won	23 May 2004	Indra Krishnan (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the dismissal of the bankruptcy order was dismissed.
15	Tapematic SpA v Wirana Pte Ltd: Agency Law & Misrepresentation in Letter of Credit Transaction 08 Jan 2002 Tapematic SpA (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	08 Jan 2002	Tapematic SpA (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against striking out of claim dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Singapore Airlines v Tan Shwu Leng: Negligence, Mitigation of Loss & Cost Allocation 15 Oct 2001 Singapore Airlines Limited (Appellant)Lost	15 Oct 2001	Singapore Airlines Limited (Appellant): Appeal DismissedSingapore Airlines Limited's appeal against the High Court's decision to enhance the loss of pre-trial earnings by $14,700 and the decision on costs was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Singapore Airlines v Tan Shwu Leng: Appeal on Pre-Trial Earnings & Costs 15 Oct 2001 Singapore Airlines Ltd (Appellant)Lost	15 Oct 2001	Singapore Airlines Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedSingapore Airlines' appeal against the High Court's decision to enhance the loss of pre-trial earnings by $14,700 and the decision on costs was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Kotjo v Ng Wei Teck: Striking Out Claim for Unused Leave in Judicial Management 16 Aug 2001 Ng Wei Teck Michael (Respondent)Won	16 Aug 2001	Ng Wei Teck Michael (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe respondents successfully defended the appeal.
19	Tan Shwu Leng v Singapore Airlines: Negligence, Damages Assessment & Mitigation 19 Mar 2001 Airbus Industrie (Respondent, Defendant)Partial	19 Mar 2001	Airbus Industrie (Respondent, Defendant): Costs partially awarded againstCosts partially awarded against Airbus Industrie (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	Chua Choon Lim Robert v MN Swami: Striking Out, Abuse of Process & Limitation Act 18 Jul 2000 Great Eastern Life Assurance Company Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	18 Jul 2000	Great Eastern Life Assurance Company Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantThe plaintiff's action against the ninth defendant was dismissed as time-barred and an abuse of process. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Kim Hok Yung v Rabobank: Striking Out Claim for Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Employment Contract 07 Jul 2000 Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA (trading as Rabobank) (Defendant, Appellant)Won	07 Jul 2000	Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA (trading as Rabobank) (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; plaintiffs' claims struck out. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	WYNO Marine v Lim Teck Cheng: Review of Costs Award in Construction Dispute 17 Jan 2000 WYNO Marine Pte Ltd (In Liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	17 Jan 2000	WYNO Marine Pte Ltd (In Liquidation) (Plaintiff): Application AllowedPlaintiffs' application allowed; costs revised from $485,000 to $560,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).