Ashvin Hariharan

Ashvin Hariharan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	6 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	5 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Youth Court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Voyeurism	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Adult offenders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Hurt	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Juvenile Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Young Offenders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ashvin Hariharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ashvin Hariharan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kalidass Law Corporation	4 cases	67% of cases	Niranjan v Public Prosecutor: Voluntarily Causing Hurt & Propensity for Reform(Jul 2023) PP v Yogesswaran & Teo: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Jun 2023) Chua Yi Jin Colin v Public Prosecutor: Revocation of Gag Order & Victims' Interests(Dec 2021)
I.R.B Law LLP	2 cases	33% of cases	Public Prosecutor v CRX: Sentencing of Young Offender for Sexual Assault(Jun 2024) GFN v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against 24-Month Detention in Juvenile Rehabilitation Centre(Nov 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ashvin Hariharan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.6 parties avg	2.6	83%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ashvin Hariharan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(83%)	83%
Neutral	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,000.00	2,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v CRX: Sentencing of Young Offender for Sexual Assault 25 Jun 2024 CRX (Defendant)Neutral	25 Jun 2024	CRX (Defendant): Reformative training imposedThe court imposed a sentence of reformative training at Level 2 intensity for a minimum period of detention of 12 months.
2	GFN v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against 24-Month Detention in Juvenile Rehabilitation Centre 05 Nov 2023 GFN (Appellant)Lost	05 Nov 2023	GFN (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed.
3	Niranjan v Public Prosecutor: Voluntarily Causing Hurt & Propensity for Reform 02 Jul 2023 Niranjan s/o Muthupalani (Appellant)Lost	02 Jul 2023	Niranjan s/o Muthupalani (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the sentences imposed by the District Judge was dismissed.
4	PP v Yogesswaran & Teo: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 18 Jun 2023 Yogesswaran C Manogaran (Defendant)Lost	18 Jun 2023	Yogesswaran C Manogaran (Defendant): ConvictionConvicted on the charge of trafficking in diamorphine under s 5(1)(a) of the Misuse of Drugs Act.
5	Chua Yi Jin Colin v Public Prosecutor: Revocation of Gag Order & Victims' Interests 23 Dec 2021 Chua Yi Jin Colin (Applicant)Lost	23 Dec 2021	Chua Yi Jin Colin (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication dismissed; applicant ordered to pay costs of $2,000 to the Prosecution (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Chandroo Subramaniam v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 25 Nov 2021 Chandroo Subramaniam (Appellant)Lost	25 Nov 2021	Chandroo Subramaniam (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.