Assomull Madan D T

Assomull Madan D T is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and guarantee.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Assomull Madan D T has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in statutory demand and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Statutory Demand	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Assomull Madan D T has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Assomull Madan D T has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Assomull Madan D T has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Assomull Madan D T has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Assomull Madan D T has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Assomull Madan D T has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Assomull Madan D T has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Hire-Purchase Agreement	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Assomull Madan D T has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Assomull Madan D T has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Assomull Madan D T has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Assomull & Partners	1 cases	50% of cases	Nagrani v United Overseas Bank: Setting Aside Statutory Demand for Debt Under Guarantees(Oct 2015)
Assomull and Partners	1 cases	50% of cases	UOB v Bombay Talkies: Winding Up Application for Failure to Pay Debt(May 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Assomull Madan D T's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Assomull Madan D T's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	240,828.92	120,414.462 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Nagrani v United Overseas Bank: Setting Aside Statutory Demand for Debt Under Guarantees 19 Oct 2015 Ramesh Mohandas Nagrani (Appellant)Lost	19 Oct 2015	Ramesh Mohandas Nagrani (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Debtor was ordered to pay the Bank costs of the appeal fixed at $8,000 plus reasonable disbursements. The costs were fixed on an indemnity basis which the Bank was entitled to under the Guarantees. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	UOB v Bombay Talkies: Winding Up Application for Failure to Pay Debt 25 May 2015 BOMBAY TALKIES (S) PTE LTD (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	25 May 2015	BOMBAY TALKIES (S) PTE LTD (Defendant, Respondent): Winding-up order grantedWinding-up order granted against the Defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.