Audie Wong Cheng Siew

Audie Wong Cheng Siew is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and conspiracy by unlawful means. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 43% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and minority oppression.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Valuation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Housing Loans	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Furniture Rebate Plan	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Supervision of paralegal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fee-sharing agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Audie Wong Cheng Siew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Audie Wong Cheng Siew has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	6 cases	86% of cases	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Share Valuation Dispute(Mar 2023) Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Valuation of Shares in Oppression Case(Feb 2023) UOB v Lippo Marina: Unlawful Means Conspiracy & Deceit in Property Sale(Oct 2022)
Premier Law LLC	1 cases	14% of cases	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation(Mar 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Audie Wong Cheng Siew's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 3 (43%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	14%
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	14%
Neutral	33.0 parties avg	3.0	43%
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	14%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2020	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Audie Wong Cheng Siew's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(14%)	14%
Lost	1(14%)	14%
Neutral	3(43%)	43%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	1(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	49,000.00	16,333.333 cases	3
USD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Neutral: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Share Valuation Dispute 02 Mar 2023 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	02 Mar 2023	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): NeutralThe judgment does not specify a direct outcome for DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
2	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Valuation of Shares in Oppression Case 07 Feb 2023 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	07 Feb 2023	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): NeutralNo specific outcome was mentioned for this party in this judgment extract.
3	UOB v Lippo Marina: Unlawful Means Conspiracy & Deceit in Property Sale 27 Oct 2022 Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	27 Oct 2022	Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; Lippo is liable to pay damages to UOB, the quantum of which will be determined at the assessment of damages. UOB awarded 70% of the costs of the appeal which we assess to be $70,000. 70% of that is $49,000. This does not include disbursements of the appeal for which UOB claims $45,256.04 because of voluminous documents. However, a substantial part of the documents was not necessary for CA 67 as they were repeat documents which were common to the purchasers. UOB should have sought directions whether they could have used sample documents instead. In the circumstances, this court awards UOB $10,000 for disbursements of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	UOB v Lippo Marina: Deceit & Conspiracy in Housing Loans for Marina Collection Units 07 Dec 2021 Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Defendant)Dismissed	07 Dec 2021	Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claims DismissedAll claims against Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd were dismissed. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
5	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Share Valuation 20 Dec 2020 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	20 Dec 2020	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): NeutralThe outcome for DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd is neutral, as it is the subject of the share valuation. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Law Society of Singapore v. Tan See Leh Jonathan: Legal Profession - Failure to Supervise Paralegal & Fee-Sharing 17 May 2020 The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	17 May 2020	The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Sanction ImposedA three-month suspension was imposed on the respondent starting from the date of the judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 11 Mar 2019 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	11 Mar 2019	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim Allowed in PartInterlocutory judgment with damages to be assessed for DyStar against Kiri for breach of cll 15.1(a) and (b) of the SSSA. DyStar was entitled to 10% of the costs of its claim against Kiri. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.