Audra Balasingam

Audra Balasingam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in wills and probate and domicile. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Audra Balasingam has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Audra Balasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Audra Balasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Audra Balasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Audra Balasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Audra Balasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Audra Balasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Audra Balasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Audra Balasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Audra Balasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Audra Balasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Audra Balasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Domicile	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Audra Balasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estate Duty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Audra Balasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Audra Balasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Automobile Repair Business	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Audra Balasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Audra Balasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Audra Balasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Audra Balasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Audra Balasingam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
KhattarWong	4 cases	100% of cases	City Ken v Comfortdelgro: Profit-Sharing Dispute in Motor Vehicle Repair Contract(Jan 2010) Car & Cars v Volkswagen: Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration(Oct 2009) Peters Roger May v Pinder Lillian Gek Lian: Domicile Dispute & Estate Duty(Apr 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Audra Balasingam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Audra Balasingam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	City Ken v Comfortdelgro: Profit-Sharing Dispute in Motor Vehicle Repair Contract 21 Jan 2010 City Ken Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Jan 2010	City Ken Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claims for $1,785,786.72 and $11,053.24 were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Car & Cars v Volkswagen: Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration 18 Oct 2009 Volkswagen Group Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	18 Oct 2009	Volkswagen Group Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent): Stay of Proceedings GrantedApplication for a stay of the action brought by the appellant in favour of arbitration granted.
3	Peters Roger May v Pinder Lillian Gek Lian: Domicile Dispute & Estate Duty 16 Apr 2009 Pinder Lillian Gek Lian (Respondent, Caveator)Lost	16 Apr 2009	Pinder Lillian Gek Lian (Respondent, Caveator): Application DeniedThe caveator's objection to the notation was denied as the court found that the deceased died domiciled in Singapore.
4	ComfortDelGro Engineering v City Ken: Dispute over Automobile Repair Contract and Amendment of Claim 03 Feb 2008 City Ken Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	03 Feb 2008	City Ken Pte Ltd (Defendant): Costs order review sought but application dismissedDefendant sought a review of the costs order, but the application was dismissed.